For LR clearly. When you see a question involves heavy Lawgic say MBT MBF Parallel reasoning etc.. Do you start mapping the lawgic right away or read it first then read it again and Map it out?
Not all X are Y. Is this translated as X some (not)Y? Also, is Not all X are Y equivalent to X some Y? For the latter question, I know in English in certain contexts, the statement "not all" of something implies "some are."
... other 7sagers on tackling Flaw question types.
I have gone ... improve with these question types. Ive noticed these question types appear quite ...
... than I initially started (12-14 questions wrong both under timed ... all the core principles. My question is, should I go through ... section or drill them by question types? Also, is there anything ...
... got every single virus game question right and only went -2 ... sections. Even with my abysmal -14 on RC (usually go -8 ... on LR. Here is my question.