Recent Comments

I don't like E but this is how I interpreted it to make sense:

The two ideas we are bridging is: The asteroid crater (Selena mentions) is not large enough for the amount dust required for an extinction, → the extinction was not due to an asteroid impact.

Now if there are more than one large asteroid is makes it POSSIBLE that enough dust could be formed to cause an extinction. This would destroy Trent's argument.

Having only one large asteroid guarantees that enough dust for an extension was not produced and protects Trent's argument.

I work at an Amazon delivery warehouse, one of the hardest jobs I have ever had to do in my life, while also balancing undergrad full time, so I am ready to take on the next challenge of my life: law school and the LSAT.

THAT'S WHY I DIDN'T CHOOSE C LSAC NEEDS TO TAKE SOME STEM COURSES FR

LOL
'Philosopher' also..

For people that chose AC C, I think I have a good explanation for why it's wrong. The passage mentions how it will be many years before CHRONIC pain sets in. Chronic means over a long period of time. It's simply a time frame delineation and does not imply anything with severity of the pain. AC C misconstrues what the passage is talking about and gets you to make an assumption that the passage is addressing the degree of pain.

B also says "regain control"

Can someone list more SA questions like this outside of the curriculum? I still have trouble with this question type even though it is "cookie-cutter"

Fell for the trap in q6. Really important to understand the question stem and not fly through it.

I need help understanding the answer choice to Question 3. Where in the passage does it say that Rawls' theory is novel? I'd argue you'd be more likely to gleam that it's controversial given the excerpt, "Unfortunately, this is an inherently retributionist idea." I was between AC (B) and AC (E) and chose (E) because I found more evidence that the theory was controversial, as opposed to novel.