It's about to negate the sufficient condition, right? any example will be appreciated.
LSAT • Tuesday, Dec 20, 2016 47064 About "without" It's about to negate the sufficient condition, right? any example will be appreciated. 0 3 Follow
3 comments
PT 61, Section 4, Problem 25. And yes it is negate sufficient.
Example Sentence: You can't have snow without cold temperatures = /Snow --------> Cold Temperatures.
Correct Interpretation: Snow ---------> Cold Temperatures (/Cold Temperatures ---------------> /Snow)
Correct. "Without" and "Unless" = chose either variable, make it the sufficient and negate it, and leave the other variable in it's non-negated form and make it the necessary condition.
Great!!Thanks. @tjphil239