The title itself is self-explanatory. I see how currently the test has been updated to the new LSAT form, but I want to know if 7sage is planning to apply that to blind reviews as well.

Please and thank you

Title basically, I have extra time accommodations, but I like to test myself to see how well I can do with standard time, but I've just discovered that when time runs out it forces you to submit, it would be nice if you're given the option to keep working

Will Mikey's (and sometimes Bailey) Tuesday lofi videos ever come back? I REALLY enjoyed them and found them helpful.

Hi,

I accidentally submitted my test before completing my blind review, and I’d love the option to go back and complete it afterward so I can compare my untimed answers with my timed results and see whether my answer patterns are consistent.

Is there any way to do this after a test has already been submitted?

Thank you!

I'd like to know my confidence level on each question while doing my blind review so I can see if I'm missing questions that I'm overly confident on. It would be similar to the "estimate score" pop-up at the end of section or practice test, but optional and less intrusive. Like a scale on the bottom of each BR question. Thanks!

I would soooo appreciate it if we could turn off the "i" previous of why 7Sage flagged a question for Blind Review while still in the process of BR. I struggle soooo hard to resist the temptation to preview it, and see if I even got the question wrong. It can be helpful on drills and practice, but for a full PrepTest, I feel like it defeats the whole purpose of BR. For me at least!

Hi! Could we get the new lsac format on BR as well? That way we can remain consistent in our highlighting patterns and also get more practice with it?

I know this may not be a universally shared interest but just an idea!

justice for KJD students 🥺 I'm class of 2028 and can't set it to that

On Lawhub the questions and stimuli/passages are centered on your computer screen.

Well, due to an extra boring stint of time at work pre holiday and a rainy Fourth of July weekend I managed to run myself out of my usage limit on the AI. I know there are differences in the plans for AI usage limits. The thing is there is no descriptive qualities to these limits. Will I go from Live to coach and only get to have three more question sets from it? There is also no other appeal to the coach plan for me being I don't have the time or inclination to meet with real coaches over zoom anyways (I assume other people are in the same boat). Purchasable AI time along with the students overall realization that the AI is quite adept at writing questions that they haven't seen before seems like a very profitable area to expand into. I know I would purchase them as I have spoken with the AI until it has gamified writing new questions and prompts for me daily then breaks down where my reasoning for every answer is correct or incorrect. I don't know if this will be something that you guys decide to do but it would be nice and it would probably be a needed advent to described how the ai timing is being purchased (text amount, message amount, other) and how much you really get with each plan to make it obvious as the whether it is a worthwhile upgrade. Hope this at least brings up some conversation about it.

Hi, first of all I wanted to say the 7sage games are awesome and there's so much variety it's incredible. However I noticed there's no game for argument part and I think it would be a very useful game. Something along the lines of in the first few levels it's just finding the conclusion. As difficulty progresses so do the task of finding other parts like find a concession, premise, sub-conclusion or other's argument. I feel like this game would be really awesome and help with many different kind of question types such as Main Conclusion, Argument Part, SA, NA and so on. I hope this suggestion helps in some way and I look forward to seeing a game like that sometime.

I know how to save drill templates, but is it possible to change the default settings for new drills?

Not sure if I'm just missing it

I was really excited to recently find our that 7 Sage has a mobile app! Unfortunately, the option to log in with Google does not exist, and trying to log in with the Google credentials I would have used did not work. Is there a way to get into my account otherwise?

Hello,

Would it be possible to have the new UI here have font that more closely resembles the LSAC's actual new UI? The comic sans-esque version currently is driving me crazy.

When I'm doing a timed section, if I pause the timer, I often forget to unpause it when I continue. This can mess up an entire practice test! I really liked how the UI would hide/blur the question when paused. At least give us the option to toggle this on/off.

Ok, I just realized that when I was clicking the timer, it just hid the countdown, it didn't actually pause it and I can pause it by opening the menu and clicking the pause button. It's kind of scary how long it took me to realize that clicking the timer wasn't actually pausing the timer. This is a really unintuitive UX. Are we allergic to words with modern design these days? Something like "hide countdown" would have made it clear what was going on

I love the study plan and how it adapts to my performance. One addition I'd find valuable: dedicated "Test Day" and "Review Day" types. I take a PT every Saturday and review it every Sunday, but right now the only way to block those days off is to mark them as rest days, which doesn't reflect what's actually happening and probably throws off the adaptive scheduling around them.

Is there a way to customize RC Drills to filter for passages where I answered multiple questions wrong? I know there is an "Incorrect Ever" filter, but I think this would include passages where I only got one answer wrong. I'd like to be able to revisit passages that I had a particularly difficult time with when I first started studying in order to see how my RC has improved.

This has been one of the best features to date! I know that studying for the LSAT is a very unique/ personal process for everyone. I find that it gives a pretty fair analysis, takes critique well, and gives a bit of direction.

HOWEVER, I've noticed that after using it for a little while, it starts to really lag. Is there a way to preserve the valuable history without the increasing time sink of lag processing?

My only other gripe is that I've noticed that it's missed things in analysis before. I feel good about catching them, but I'd like it to be a bit more thorough as dev continues to build on this function. Many thanks!

I really like Kevin's style of explanation, but there are no options to choose Kevin as my choice! It would be great if there is a button that only brings up problem solving videos by Kevin!

Ive accidentally skipped blind review so many times, i wish there was a way to go back and do blind review after you have already clicked out of a PT or section

Hi, could we have a feature that shows us which of the 4 sections were experimental? Also, not sure if this had been addressed- but is there plans to update the BR up to the new law hub appearance?

I love this little critter, it’s a really good motivator and when I need to reason something or have it give suggestions on my WAJ it does a great job. When I’m struggling with something as well it gives great advice that works. However, you can tell once the chat has run off too long because it starts referencing the same 5 things from the beginning of the conversation and god forbid you say something about doing this and going to bed, it’s gonna reference that forever. I think it’d be really helpful to automatically start a new chat every day or something to that effect instead of being forced to when it degrades too much.

I like the question analytics feature where it shows your accuracy with certain question types and will also show you what the level of accuracy for that question type is for those who achieve your goal score. I am wondering if there can be a feature added that will calculate out an estimate LSAT score for someone based on their accuracy with each question type.

I feel this feature would allow people to see in real time what increases in accuracy with certain question types is doing for them. Maybe someone in the course of a week only increase some question types by 3-5% and feel discouraged if the suggested accuracy is still 15% away, but this feature could hopefully counteract that by showing the affect on someone's predicted score - something that all of us care about greatly due to the consequences the score can have for us.

Obviously a disclaimer regarding the accuracy of such a feature would be important, since the only real way to be confident in reaching that score is to take PTs to simulate the actual exam and built mental endurance, but I still think this would have its uses as a motivation for people.