Is there a way to customize RC Drills to filter for passages where I answered multiple questions wrong? I know there is an "Incorrect Ever" filter, but I think this would include passages where I only got one answer wrong. I'd like to be able to revisit passages that I had a particularly difficult time with when I first started studying in order to see how my RC has improved.

This has been one of the best features to date! I know that studying for the LSAT is a very unique/ personal process for everyone. I find that it gives a pretty fair analysis, takes critique well, and gives a bit of direction.

HOWEVER, I've noticed that after using it for a little while, it starts to really lag. Is there a way to preserve the valuable history without the increasing time sink of lag processing?

My only other gripe is that I've noticed that it's missed things in analysis before. I feel good about catching them, but I'd like it to be a bit more thorough as dev continues to build on this function. Many thanks!

I really like Kevin's style of explanation, but there are no options to choose Kevin as my choice! It would be great if there is a button that only brings up problem solving videos by Kevin!

Ive accidentally skipped blind review so many times, i wish there was a way to go back and do blind review after you have already clicked out of a PT or section

Hi, could we have a feature that shows us which of the 4 sections were experimental? Also, not sure if this had been addressed- but is there plans to update the BR up to the new law hub appearance?

I love this little critter, it’s a really good motivator and when I need to reason something or have it give suggestions on my WAJ it does a great job. When I’m struggling with something as well it gives great advice that works. However, you can tell once the chat has run off too long because it starts referencing the same 5 things from the beginning of the conversation and god forbid you say something about doing this and going to bed, it’s gonna reference that forever. I think it’d be really helpful to automatically start a new chat every day or something to that effect instead of being forced to when it degrades too much.

I like the question analytics feature where it shows your accuracy with certain question types and will also show you what the level of accuracy for that question type is for those who achieve your goal score. I am wondering if there can be a feature added that will calculate out an estimate LSAT score for someone based on their accuracy with each question type.

I feel this feature would allow people to see in real time what increases in accuracy with certain question types is doing for them. Maybe someone in the course of a week only increase some question types by 3-5% and feel discouraged if the suggested accuracy is still 15% away, but this feature could hopefully counteract that by showing the affect on someone's predicted score - something that all of us care about greatly due to the consequences the score can have for us.

Obviously a disclaimer regarding the accuracy of such a feature would be important, since the only real way to be confident in reaching that score is to take PTs to simulate the actual exam and built mental endurance, but I still think this would have its uses as a motivation for people.

I'll be traveling this weekend and won't have internet access but would love to spend the time studying. Is there a way to use any of 7Sage's features offline? Or does anybody have any recommendations on offline studying?

Intro

I have been using the AI tutor since it came out to study for the August LSAT exam, and here are some of my main thoughts on it.

Usage Limits

I wish there was a warning or something when you're close to reaching the AI tutor usage limit. I never used it for images or anything extremely intensive, but I think a monthly limit as opposed to a daily one like other AI tools is a lot more unpredictable. Given that the subscription is $69/month at a minimum and the tutor isn't really useful for reasoning about the actual questions, I think the usage limit should either be more generous or reset more regularly.

If you still want a way to sell it as a feature for higher tiers, I think stuff like image access would be a better selling point, since people who are paying for that tier likely are more willing to pay for tutoring anyway.

Good Features

1) It is helpful that it can do things like make drills featuring questions you have not seen in X amount of days, but it does make me wonder why exactly users of the normal drill builder don't already have that feature.

2) It has a good memory. I have given it a list of mistakes I tend to make and asked it to categorize my mistakes based on my WAJ write ups for each given question, and it does a pretty good job of categorizing what exactly went wrong. This can also be a problem, because sometimes it feels obsessed with trying to show you that it remembered what you said, like it read a book on how to get people to like it or something.

3) It's a good motivator

Major Flaws

1) It has no concept of time, but it keeps trying to assure me that it knows what time and day it is.

2) It can be quite the sycophant, but I appreciate that there is a "coach" voice where sometimes it senses you are making a compromise or doing a drill that is below your skill level. Who else would notice I have done 4 sessions in a row without touching RC?

3) I have no idea how to tell why it believes anything it does. A personal issue I was having was that I was not diagramming difficult parallel flaw questions because I was following the wisdom that one should not diagram unless it is absolutely necessary. The AI tutor said something like the following: "Oh yeah, classic 170+ scorer thing, they burn tons of time refusing to diagram because of their pride and actually use up more time than if they had just diagrammed."

Do people ever do that? Maybe? It sounds plausible? But like, I have no idea if that's true.

I noticed that you can only choose the amount of times that you can study for the lessons, but not when you started after lessons, drills and tests, it’s not letting you customize how much you can study weekly. You can only generate a block and then it gives you three options which is not suitable for most us. I want to customize my study blocks.

You know how every PT question has a comments/discussion thread attached to it? It'd be nice to have that same functionality for the daily Logic Links game. It'd be nice to have daily versions of the other games as well (makes me more likely to play when I know I won't get repeat content, makes each day's puzzle/game a shared event, etc).

I made a post about this June 28th Logic Links puzzle and realized it would've been easier to just leave a comment the way I normally would if this were a challenging PT question!

I think it could be useful to add space repetition drills for some things. The two I can think of off the top of my head are:

• the "indicator words" (sufficient, necessary, negate-sufficient, negate-necessary)

• identifying question types

I did some SR myself with flashcards, but the word set is limited as I just picked from the most common ones, and the ID question types is hard to do physically without a lot of work. Being able to easily and effortlessly id indicator words and id question types is such a hack to speeding up and removing analysis exhaustion on the small things.

I recently did https://7sage.com/lessons/logical-reasoning/sufficient-assumption-questions/skill-builder-logical-reasoning-question-stems-first-half and wish I could just hit 20-30 of these a every other day or so until its second nature.

I love checking in on my analytics. It helps me dial out of the last drill or PT or section I did and instead focus on the big picture. One issue: it is very hard sometimes to see the trend of my practice. I would love to be able to see that although I may have had a few bad drills recently, overall, my PT equivalent score is improving. Of course, this would have to come with a warning of some kind not to rely to heavily on the trend line as there is more than just the raw numbers that should define someone’s progress/confidence, this would just help mine a lot!

Is there a way we can create a drilling feature where we only want to focus on the incorrect ones that we haven't gotten right yet? For example, if I were to drill on my incorrect questions but eventually got some right, the next drill of incorrect questions would exclude those.

It would be great to see an overall trend chart of my priority tags. For example, my highest priority tag is 80% today, did some drills, went up to 82%. I would like to be able to see this growth over time and see my history of what the tag was previously. For all I know I could have started as 60% at this tag and I have made huge improvements. I think being aware of these achievements would be really motivating.

There is already a Most Recent feature on drills but I always want to redo the questions I had seen the longest time ago so I have to scroll all the way to the bottom. Can we add a Least Recent feature to make this easier?

I would find it helpful to know the schools offering part time programs and would like to see my admissions changes based on that school data.

Is it possible to bold the word "except" in the new Tester UI? LSAC's Demo UI for the post-August 2026 Tester also bolds it:

Hi!

It would be so nice if we could create drills that include questions from a variety of different Statuses for the same drill.

For example:

Making a 20 Question Drill that includes a variety of "Fresh" questions as well as "Incorrect on Last Take".

or

Making a 20 Question Drill that includes "Incorrect on Last Take" as well as "Incorrect more than Once"

I feel this would really assist with my studying and drilling questions that I've gotten incorrect, while also being able to throw in some new ones in the mix. As sometimes the "pool" of questions for a single Status is relatively small, so it would be nice to be able to do longer drills that could incorporate multiple categories.

Anybody else feel this would help their studying?

I think it would be super helpful if we were able to filter the incorrect answers for drilling by oldest answered. It often happens with me that when I reattempt previously missed questions in drills, I get ones that I recently missed and therefore remember the answer so I cannot actually reattempt the question by working through the logic. I know some studiers only study for a few months before taking the LSAT and ending their time with 7Sage but for users who study for 6+ months I think this filter will be very useful because the chance of remember older questions from a year ago are slim. Thanks!

I know that when you first link your 7Sage and LawHub Advantage, it imports your PrepTests. Is there a way to input PrepTests taken on LawHub Advantage after that first time? I recently took a Preptest on LawHub and would prefer not to have to "retake" it just for the analytics--which wouldn't be accurate anyways, at least timing wise.

Any ideas?

There may be a way to do this that I have not figured out yet, but I would love to highlight and annotate lessons as I go through them. It helps me comprehend what I read better and would make it easier to find important parts if I bookmark lessons to return to them.

I would love it if there was a way to see how much time I spent on 7sage on a given day. Could even be divided by how much time spent doing sections, drills, or full prep tests, as well as an other section for video/course refreshes. It would make it way easier to hold myself accountable with time spent studying each day since the study blocks aren’t modifiable and I often don’t complete it exactly as laid out.

I wanted to turn the Lawhub automatic import feature off and was told that it's not possible.

Can you please make it possible to turn that feature off?

There are many PTs on Lawhub that I used for blind review, before subscribing 7sage.

Also there are a lot of PTs that I used for just one section practice, so my score is like 120.

It's messing up my analytics :(!

I didn't have any problem before, cause I never used import from lawhub feature, and only manually imported PTs which I actually used for full PT.

I wanted to reach out to the 7sage team and suggest an addition to the Blind Review/Review process. I think it would be very useful to add a Wrong Answer Journal WAJ tab to the review program. I use the notes section and its helpful to articulate the reasons for answer choices as I am working through the problem. The issue I see is that, when I go back to review all the 'Notes' that I've made in the past in the 'Notes' tab, the interface only shows me the blank answer without any highlighting I added or the answers that I selected when I attempted the question initially. It would be great to create a WAJ within the system for ease of use and access. I've struggled to find a suitable template that works well for me; the note system in 7Sage is great bc it is immediately there and the information can easily be accessed and represented clearly in the 7Sage format.

Thoughts?