Self-study
P1
In recent years, a growing belief that the way society decides what to treat as true is controlled through largely unrecognized discursive practices has led legal reformers to examine the complex interconnections between narrative and law. ██ ████ █████ ████████ █████ █████████ ███ █████ ██ █████████ ███████ █████ ███████ ███████ ██████ █████████ █████ ███████ ██████ ███ ██████ ████ ████████ ████ ███████ ██ ████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ ██████ ███
Context ·
How do we decide what is true or false?
Legal systems use competing narratives about events; judges and juries assign "truth"
Introduce concept ·
Objectivism
The "objective" view is neutral, unbiased, and more reliable than other views
Apply concept ·
of objectivism to legal "truth"
Truth is found in an objective view of events
Criticism ·
No one holds an objective view
Support criticism ·
According to psychologists, everyone holds biases
Author's perspective ·
Legal views are subjective, not objective
P2
███ ████████ ████ ██████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ██ ███████████ █████ █████████ ██ █████ █████████████ ███ ███████ ██████ ██ ██ ███████████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ██ ██████ ███ ███ ███████ ██ █████ ██████████ █████ ███ ███████ ██ █████ ███ ███ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ██████
Problem ·
Objectivist assumptions favor those with legal training
Accounts by those who understand the law are (wrongly) seen as objective and true; others accounts are (wrongly) seen as false
P3
█████ ████████ ████ ██ ████████ █████████ ███████ █████ ███ ████ ███████ ████ ██████ ███████████ ███ ███ ██████ █████ ██ ██████ ███████ ███ ████████████ ██ ███████████ █████ ███████████ ███
Solution ·
according to some legal scholars
Alternative legal narratives
Explain solution ·
Replace abstract objectivist discourse with personal narratives
Support solution ·
Personal stories elicit empathy
Implications of solution ·
Disruption of status quo, less advantage bestowed by legal training, emphasis on empathy
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Problem-analysis
11.
Which one of the following ████ █████████ ███ █████ ██ █
a
logical thinking uninfluenced ██ ███████
This is the best answer. “Uninfluenced by passion” is supported by the fact that the cognition isn’t based on emotion/experience. “Logical thinking” has some support from the fact the cognition involves abstract discourse and that objectivism involves neutrality. You won’t find the words “logical” or “logic,” in the passage, but there’s no other answer that’s better supported.
b
the interpretation of ██████ ████
We have no reason to think “cognition” in context has anything to do with visual cues. The author doesn’t suggest that a difference between objectivist legal discourse and what the legal scholars propose relates to sight, vision, or how things visually appear.
c
human thought that ███████████ ███ ███████ ███ ██████████
d
the reasoning actually ████████ ██ ██████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ █████████
This doesn’t fit, because the author mentions that
e
sudden insights inspired ██ ███ █████ ██ ████████ ███████