Some government economists view their home countries as immune to outside influence. βββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββββββββββ βββββ βββββββββββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββ β βββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββ ββββββββ
The author concludes that government economists must look beyond national borders in order for their nationsβ economies to prosper. This is based on the fact that economies are always open systems β in other words, things outside a nationβs borders can significantly affect an economy.
The premise establishes that things beyond a nationβs borders can significantly affect a nationβs economy. But this doesnβt establish what government economists must look at in order for their nationsβ economies to prosper. Why couldnβt the economists simply focus on things internal to the nation? Sure, there are external factors that influence the economy, but do we have to pay attention to them? Maybe internal factors alone are enough to allow a nationβs economy to prosper.
The argument's conclusion follows logically ββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
A national economy ββββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ ββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββ
Economics is weakly βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββ
Economic theories relying ββ βββββββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββββββ
International trade is βββ βββββββ βββββββββββ ββββββββ βββββββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ
Some government economists ββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββββββββββββ βββββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ