Some government economists view their home countries as immune to outside influence. ███ █████████ ███ ██████ ████ ████████ █████████████ █████ █████████████ ███████ ██████ ███ ██████ ████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ███ ████████████ ██ █ █████████ █████ ██ █████████████ ████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ █████████ ████████████ ███████ ██████████ ██████████ ████ ████ ██████ ████████ ███████ ██ █████ ████████ █████████ ███ ██ ████████
The author concludes that government economists must look beyond national borders in order for their nations’ economies to prosper. This is based on the fact that economies are always open systems — in other words, things outside a nation’s borders can significantly affect an economy.
The premise establishes that things beyond a nation’s borders can significantly affect a nation’s economy. But this doesn’t establish what government economists must look at in order for their nations’ economies to prosper. Why couldn’t the economists simply focus on things internal to the nation? Sure, there are external factors that influence the economy, but do we have to pay attention to them? Maybe internal factors alone are enough to allow a nation’s economy to prosper.
The argument's conclusion follows logically ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
A national economy ██████ ███████ ██████ █████ ███████████ █████████ ██ ██ ███ ████ ████████ ██ ████ ████████ ██████████ ███████████
Economics is weakly █████████ ██ ███ ████████ █████████
Economic theories relying ██ █████████████ ███ █████████ ████ ████████ ████ ████████ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ██████████████
International trade is ███ ███████ ███████████ ████████ ███████████ ██████ ███ ██████
Some government economists ████ ████ ████████ ███ ███████ ██ █████████████ █████ ██ ██████ ███ ██████