PT114.S2.Q3

PrepTest 114 - Section 2 - Question 3

Hide analysis

David: Forbidding companies from hiring permanent replacements for striking employees would be profoundly unfair. ████ █████████ █████ ████ ██████ ████████ ██ █████ ████████████ ████ █████████

████ ███ ███ █████████ █████ █████ ████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ████████████ ██ ████ █████ █████████ █████████████

Summary

David claims that disallowing companies to hire permanent replacements for striking employees is unfair because the companies would have little leverage to negotiate with striking employees. Lin disagrees, and claims that companies would have sufficient leverage to negotiate even if they hired temporary replacements.

Strongly Supported Conclusions

David and Lin disagree about the amount of leverage companies would have if those companies were forbidden from hiring permanent replacements for striking employees.

Show answer
3.

Which one of the following ██████████ ██ ████ ████████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████ █████ ███ ████

a

David does not ███████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ █████████ ████████████ █████ █████████ ███ ████████ ██ █████ ████████████ ████ █████████

We don’t know whether David believes that hiring temporary replacements would result in a company not having any leverage for negotiations. We only know that, unless the companies were allowed to hired permanent replacements, David believes companies would have little leverage.

3%
b

David and Lin ███████ ████ █████████ ██████ ██ ███████ ██ ████ ████████ ██ ████████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████████

We don’t know whether David or Lin believe that companies should have an equal amount of leverage compared to striking employees.

5%
c

David and Lin ████████ ████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ █████████ ████ ██ █████ ████████████ ████ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ██ ████ █████████ █████████████

David believes that companies have little leverage for negotiations if companies are forbidden from hiring permanent replacements. Lin believes that companies have sufficient leverage for negotiations even if companies hired temporary replacements.

82%
d

David and Lin ████████ ████ ███ ████ ████████ ██████ ██ ████████ █████████ ██ █████ ████████████ ████ █████████

We don’t know what David or Lin believe to be an appropriate amount of leverage for companies. Rather, their disagreement is about how much leverage companies have based on the types of replacements the companies are allowed to hire.

8%
e

Lin believes it ██ ██████ ██ ██████ █████████ ████ ██████ █████████ ████████████ ███ █████ ████████ ██████████

We don’t know whether Lin believes forbidding companies from hiring permanent replacements is unfair. We only know that she believes companies have sufficient leverage for negotiations even if the companies hire temporary replacements.

1%

Confirm action

Are you sure?