One of the greatest challenges facing medical students today, apart from absorbing volumes of technical information and learning habits of scientific thought, is that of remaining empathetic to the needs of patients in the face of all this rigorous training. █████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ██████████ █████ █████████████ ████ ████ ███ ████████ ███ ███████ ███████ ██ ██████████ ███ ████ ████████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ████████████ ███ █████████ ████ ██████ ███████ █████████ ███
Problem ·How to train medical students to be empathetic?
They can't just be immersed in textbooks and science. They need to be connected to patients to be empathetic and ethical.
There are still moral principles. Using narrative literature threads the needle between two moral extremes: dogmatically absolutist and extremely relativistic.
Conclusion ·Narrative literature better than traditional ethics training
Provides a deeper understanding of human nature and a more flexible application of moral principles.
Passage Style
Problem-analysis
Single position
27.
The author's attitude regarding the ███████████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██████ ██ ███████ ██████ ███ ████ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██
Question Type
Author’s attitude
Implied
This Inference question asks the author’s attitude toward the traditional methods of teaching ethics in medical school. The author discusses these traditional methods in P2. Here, we see that the author concedes that this traditional approach can be valuable, but the author thinks that the traditional approach doesn’t sufficiently prepare medical students for the ethical dilemmas faced by physicians.
The author concedes that the traditional approach can be valuable, so we can’t say that the author’s attitude is unqualified disapproval of the method.
The author doesn’t reserve judgement; we know that the author is partially opposed to the method of traditional ethical training, since this traditional method leaves students unprepared.
The author isn’t indifferent toward the effects of traditional ethical instruction; the author has at least partial disapproval of the effects of the traditional method because the method leaves students unprepared.
The author concedes that the traditional approach can be valuable, so we can’t say that the author’s attitude is disapproval toward all of its effects.
This is the author’s attitude. The author partially disapproves of the method (because it leaves students unprepared) but the author concedes that at least one effect (conceptual clarity) is valuable.
Difficulty
49% of people who answer get this correct
This is a very difficult question.
It is slightly harder than the average question in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%151
165
75%178
Analysis
Author’s attitude
Implied
Humanities
Problem-analysis
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
7%
159
b
16%
159
c
13%
159
d
16%
161
e
49%
165
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.