Self-study
Unquestionably, inventors of useful devices deserve credit for their ingenuity, but Support the engineers who help develop an invention get too little recognition. ████████ █████████ █████████ █████ ██ █████ ███ ██████████ ████ ██████ █████████ ████ █████████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ████ █████████ ████████ ███ ███████ ██████████ █████████ ████ ███████ ██████ ███ █████ █████████████
Summarize Argument
In addition to inventors, engineers deserve credit for their contribution to inventions. They don’t usually get enough recognition, even though engineers are tasked with turning an inventor’s insight into something tangible and useful.
Identify Argument Part
This part of the argument is a small concession. The argument does not apply in every case because sometimes inventors act as their own engineers, so they do get the credit they deserve. It qualifies the scope of the claim, showing that it applies in most, but not all, cases.
25.
The claim that inventors sometimes █████ ██ █████ ███ █████████ █████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ █████ ██ ███ █████████
a
It separates the █████████ ███ ███████████ ███████ ██ ███ █████████
This statement does not separate the practical and theoretical, it just explains some cases where the argument does not apply. The argument does not really have practical/theoretical aspects to separate.
b
It indicates that ███ ███████ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ███ █████ ██ █████ █████████
This accurately describes how this statement functions. It explains the situations in which the problem of recognition does not apply: when inventors serve as their own engineers.
c
It supports an ███████ █████████ █████████ ████ ██ ██ █████ ██ ███ █████████
It doesn’t support what is at issue - or support anything. Instead, it shows exceptions to the issue.
d
It concedes that █ ███████████ ██ █████ ███ ████████ ██████ ██ ████████
While there is a concession occurring, it is not saying that the distinction between inventor and engineer is unclear. The distinction is clear, there are just cases where one individual acts as both.
e
It introduces an ███████████ ████████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ████████ ██ ███████████
The author is not suggesting that inventors be their own engineers, they are suggesting that they should get the credit that is due to them.