Unquestionably, inventors of useful devices deserve credit for their ingenuity, but Support the engineers who help develop an invention get too little recognition. ████████ █████████ █████████ █████ ██ █████ ███ ██████████ ████ ██████ █████████ ████ █████████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ████ █████████ ████████ ███ ███████ ██████████ █████████ ████ ███████ ██████ ███ █████ █████████████
In addition to inventors, engineers deserve credit for their contribution to inventions. They don’t usually get enough recognition, even though engineers are tasked with turning an inventor’s insight into something tangible and useful.
This part of the argument is a small concession. The argument does not apply in every case because sometimes inventors act as their own engineers, so they do get the credit they deserve. It qualifies the scope of the claim, showing that it applies in most, but not all, cases.
The claim that inventors sometimes █████ ██ █████ ███ █████████ █████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ █████ ██ ███ █████████
It separates the █████████ ███ ███████████ ███████ ██ ███ █████████
It indicates that ███ ███████ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ███ █████ ██ █████ █████████
It supports an ███████ █████████ █████████ ████ ██ ██ █████ ██ ███ █████████
It concedes that █ ███████████ ██ █████ ███ ████████ ██████ ██ ████████
It introduces an ███████████ ████████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ████████ ██ ███████████