Social scientists have traditionally defined multipolar international systems as consisting of three or more nations, each of roughly equal military and economic strength. βββ
βββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββββββ βββ βββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββ
ββββββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββ ββ βββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββ β ββββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ
ββββ ββββββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββ ββ β βββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββ β βββ ββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββ ββ βββββ βββ βββ βββ
Which one of the following ββββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββββββββ
The weaknesses of ββββ βββββ ββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββββββββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ
The author doesnβt discuss weaknesses of both types of systems. She discusses a multipolar system that created instability, but she also discusses a bipolar system that promoted peace. Also, the function of this paragraph is to reinforce her argument from P3.
A prediction is ββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ
In P3, the author suggests that the current multipolar system in Europe might threaten security in the future. But in P4, she discusses a multipolar system in Europe that created instability in the past. She does this to reinforce her argument that the traditional view of multipolar and bipolar systems should be reassessed.
A new argument ββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββββββ βββββββββ β βββ βββββββ βββββββ
The author does give an example of a bipolar system that promoted peace, but she never argues that Europe should embrace a new bipolar system. Her overall argument isnβt about European stability; itβs about the traditional view of multipolar and bipolar systems. The European multipolar system in P4 is just an example to reinforce her main point.
Twentieth-century European history ββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ
In the final paragraph, the author gives an example of a multipolar system in twentieth-century Europe that created instability and conflict. The purpose of this is to expand on
The typical characteristics ββ βββ βββββ βββββββ ββ β βββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββββββ
In the final paragraph, the author gives an example of a bipolar system that promoted peace, but she doesnβt review the characteristics of both members of this particular system. Even if she did, the function of the paragraph is to reinforce her argument that the traditional view of multipolar and bipolar systems should be reassessed.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnostic