Sometimes it is advisable for a medical patient to seek a second opinion. ███ ████ ███████ ███ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ███ ███████ ███ ███ ███████████ █████ ███ ███████ █████ ███████ ████ ███ █████ █████████ ████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████████ ███ ███ █████ █████████ █████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ██████ █ ██████ ███████ ███████ ██████████ █ ███████████ ████████████ ███ ███ ██████ █████████ ██ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ██████████ ███ ████ █ █████████ ███████ ███ █████ ██████████ ███ ██████████████ █ ███████████ █████
Seeking a second medical opinion can be awkward for all parties involved. The patient might fear offending the first doctor, the first doctor could feel their professional pride is at stake, and the second doctor may find it uncomfortable to assess a colleague’s work.
Getting a second medical opinion can be uncomfortable for the patient and both doctors involved.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ █ ██████
Because of the ███████████ █████████ ██ ██ ████ ███ ████████ ███ ██ ████ ██████ ████████ ██████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██████████
The stimulus does not make this argument. While the author concludes that seeking a second opinion can be awkward, she does not advise avoiding a second opinion unless necessary. In fact, the author recognizes that seeking a second opinion is advisable in certain situations.
In cases in █████ ██████ ████████ ███ ██████████ ███ █████ █████████ █████ █████ ████ ███ ██ ███ ████████████ ████████ ██ ██████ ████ █████████
This answer addresses the argument’s second premise, not its main conclusion. The stimulus explains that a second opinion can make the first doctor uncomfortable by suggesting they may have made a mistake, making the situation awkward for the first doctor.
The process of █████████ █ ██████ ███████ ███████ ███ ██ ███████ ███ █████ █████████
This is a good summary of the argument’s main conclusion. The phrase “this process” in the stimulus refers to getting a second medical opinion, which the stimulus concludes can be awkward for the patient and both doctors involved.
Physicians who are ██████ ████ ██ █████ ██████ ████████ ███ ██████ █████████████ █████ ██████████ ███ ████ ██ ███████████
This answer addresses the argument’s third premise, not its main conclusion. The stimulus explains that the second doctor may feel uncomfortable evaluating a colleague’s work, making the second opinion process awkward for the second doctor.
In many cases ██ █████ ███████ ████████ ████ ██████ █████████ ████ ███ █████████ █████ █████████ ███ █████ ██████████
This answer paraphrases the argument’s first premise. The stimulus notes that patients fear offending the first doctor by seeking a second opinion, and the stimulus uses this claim to support its main conclusion that this process is awkward for both the patient and the doctors.