During most of the nineteenth century, many French women continued to be educated according to models long established by custom and religious tradition. ███
███ █████ ██ █████ █████████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ███ █████████████ █████████ █████████ ████ █████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ████████ ███ ██ ████ ████ ████████ ██████████ ████ ████████████ ███ ████████ ████████ █████ ███████ █████████ ███ █ ██████ ████ ████ ██████ ██ ███████ ██ ████ ██████ ███████████ ██████ ██ █████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ████████ █████ ██ █████ ████ ████ ██████ ████ ███ ████████ ████ ██ █████████ ████ ███████ ███ ████ ███ ███ █████ ██ ███████████ ████████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ███ ████ █████ ███████ ██ ███████ █ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███
████ ███████ ████████ ███ ████ ██ ████████ █ ██████ ██ █████████ ████ ███ █████ █████ ███ ██████ ███ ████ ███████ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ████ ██ █████ ████████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ █████████ █████████ ██ ███████████ █████████ ███ █████ ██ ███ █████ ███
Suppose that two proposals were ███ ███████ ██ █████████ ██████████ ███████ ██████ ██████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ █████ ██ █████████ ██ ████ ███████ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ██ █████████ █████████ ██ ███ ██████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████
"Housing should be ████ █████████ ██ ████ ███ █████ ██████ █████████ ██████ ██ ██████████████████
“Housing should be made available to all” is analogous to the first proposal’s call for education to be made “
"Housing should be ████ █████████ ██ ████ ███ ████ ███████ ██ ███████ ██████ ██ █████████
“The quality of housing should be improved” isn’t analogous to the second proposal. The second proposal didn’t necessarily advocate for better education; it advocated for equal education.
"There should be ███████ ███ ███ ███ ███ ████ ███ ████████ ██████ ██ ██ ███████ ████████
“There should be housing for all who can pay” isn’t analogous to the first proposal. The first proposal advocated for education available to “everyone.” This doesn’t involve a condition on payment or income or wealth in order to get education.
"The quality of ███████ ██████ ██ █████████ ███ █████ ██████ █████████ ██████ ██ ██████████████████
“The quality of housing should be improved” isn’t analogous to the first proposal. The first proposal didn’t advocate for better education. It advocated for both men and women to be given education, although each would get different curricula.
"Low-cost housing should ██ ████████████ ███ ████████ ██████ ██ ██ ███████ ████████
“Low-cost housing should be constructed” isn’t analogous to the first proposal. The first proposal didn’t advocate for low-cost education; it advocated for education available for everyone.