PT130.S4.Q12

PrepTest 130 - Section 4 - Question 12

Hide analysis

Sahira: To make a living from their art, artists of great potential would have to produce work that would gain widespread popular acclaim, instead of their best work. ████ ██ ███ ███████████ ███ █████████ ██ ███████████ ████████

███████ ████ ████████ ███ ███████████ ███ ███████ ██ ████████ ████ ██ ████ ██████████ ███████ ████████ ███████ ████ ███████ █████████ █████ ████ █████ ████ █████ ███ ████ ████ ███ ██ █████

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position

Rahima implicitly concludes that Sahira’s argument is flawed. She counters Sahira’s argument by saying that Sahira's conclusion— that governments should subsidize artists— relies on the assumption that artists must produce lesser work to gain popularity. Rahima argues that this assumption isn't necessarily true.

Describe Method of Reasoning

Rahima undermines Sahira’s argument by calling into question Sahira’s implicit assumption that an artist’s best work can’t gain widespread popular acclaim.

Show answer
12.

In her argument, Rahima

a

disputes an implicit ██████████ ██ ████████

Rahima disputes Sahira’s implicit assumption: that artists need to produce work that’s not their best in order to gain popular acclaim. In doing so, Rahima points out that an artist’s best work could also be popular. This weakens Sahira’s argument.

88%
b

presents independent support ███ ████████ ████████

Rahima doesn’t present any support for Sahira’s argument. Instead, she argues against Sahira’s assumption.

0%
c

accepts Sahira's conclusion, ███ ███ ███████ █████████ ████ █████ █████ ██ ██████

Rahima doesn’t state whether or not she agrees with Sahira’s conclusion that governments are justified in subsidizing artists. She also doesn’t provide any alternative reasons to support this conclusion.

2%
d

uses Sahira's premises ██ █████ █ ██████████ █████████ ████ ████ ███████ ██ ██████

Rahima doesn’t use Sahira’s premises to reach a different conclusion. In fact, she doesn’t commit to a position on government subsidies at all. She just undermines Sahira’s conclusion by questioning a key assumption on which Sahira’s premises depend.

8%
e

argues that a ████████ ████ ███ ██████ ██████ ████ ██ ██████████████████

Rahima doesn’t claim that Sahira adheres to a particular standard in the first place, much less that any standard is self-contradictory.

2%

Confirm action

Are you sure?