PT132.S3.P1.Q1

PrepTest 132 - Section 3 - Passage 1 - Question 1

Hide analysis
P1

The work of South African writer Ezekiel Mphahlele has confounded literary critics, especially those who feel compelled to draw a sharp distinction between autobiography and fiction. ███

Intro topic · Writer Ezekiel Mphahlele and how to classify his work
If critics who want a sharp distinction between autobiography and fiction are "confounded" by Mphahlele, then Mphahlele's work probably doesn't fit those categories
█████ ███████ █████ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ███████████ ████ █████████████ ████ ██████ ██████ ███ ███ ████ █████ ███ ██████████████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██ ████████████ ███ █████ █████ ███ █████████████ ██████ ███ ████ ████ ███ ████ █████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ████████████ ███████ █████ ██ ███ █████████████ ███ █████████ ███████ ██ ████ ██ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ██ ██ ████ ██████ ███
Critics' perspective · Difficult to categorize Mphahlele's work
Two examples: an autobiography and a novel, with the novel apparently including autobiographical details
███████ ████ █████████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ █████████████ ███ ███ ██████ ██ ███ █████████████████ ███ █████ ███ █████ ██ ███████████ ██████ ██████████ ████ ███ ████ ████ █████████ ███████████ █████████ █████ █████ ██████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ██████ ███████ ██ █████████

Author's response to critics · Mphahlele intentionally defies categorization
Critics say Mphahlele's autobiography is too fictional and his novel too autobiographical, but they miss the point
P2

████ █████ ███████ ████ ███ █ █████████ ████████ ███ ███ █████ █████ ███████ █████ █ ████████ ████████ ███ ████████ ███ ██████ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ██ ██████ █████████ ████████████ ███████████ ███ ██████████ ████ ███ ████ ████████████ ███ █████ ███████████ ███ █████ █████ ████ ██ ███ ██ ███ ████████████ ██ ████ █████████ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ████████ ███ ████████ ████ ██████ ███ ███ ████ █████ ██ ████████ ███ ████████ ████████████ ██ ███ ██████ █████ ███ █████ ███ ███ ████████ ██████████ ██ ███ █████████ ███████ ██ ████████ ██ ████████████████ █████████ ███ ██ █████████ ████ ██████████ ███████████ ███

Expand on critics' perspective · Backhanded praise for novel
Critics imply that "The Wanderers" isn't great literature, dismiss it because it features real people
█████████ ███████ ███████ ███████ ████ ███████ ██ ████████ ███ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██████████ ████████████ ████ █████ ███ ██████ ███ ██████ ███
Mphahlele's response to critics · They're wrong; novel does feature an important fictional element
███ ███ ███████ ███████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████ ████ ████████ ███ █████ ██████ ██ ███ ██ █████ ██ █████████████████ ███ ██████████████████ █████████ ██ █ ████████ ███ ██ ███████████████ ███ ███ ████████ ███████████ ██████████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ███████ █████ ████ ██ ████ ██████ ███████ █████████ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ███ ████████ ████ █ ██████ ██████

Author's explanation of Mphahlele's motivation · Social ideals underlie his work
Unclear what "humanist" and "integrationist" mean, but they're social ideals, and the author thinks they come through well in Mphahlele's writing; meanwhile, critics think Mphahlele's vision is incomplete
P3

█████████ ███████ █████ ██████ ████████ ██ ████████████ ██████████ ██ ███████████ █████████████ ████ ████████ ██████ ██ ████ █████ ██ ████ ██████ ██████ ██ ██ █████████████ ███ ███ █████████ ██ █ ██████ ██ ███████ ████ ██ ████████ ███ █████ ████████ ███████ ██ ████████ █████ ███

Contrast · Mphahlele's views against critics' views mentioned earlier
Critics concerned with categorizing Mphahlele's work as autobiography (fact) v. fiction, but Mphahlele says there's no such thing as pure fiction or absolute fact in novels
██ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ █████ ███ ███████ ██ █████ ██████ ████ ███ ███████ ████ ██ █████ ████ ███ ████████ ████████████ ███ ████ ███ ██ ████ █████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ █ ███ ██ ██ ████████ ███ █████████████ ██ ███ ██████ ███████ █████████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ████ ██████████ ████████ ███
More on Mphahlele's motivation · Melds fact and fiction
Takes real experiences and then works in fictional elements to convey his social message
██ ██ ███████ ███ █████ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███████ ███ ███████ ██ ██ ████ ███████████████ ██ ███ █████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████████ ██ ██████ ███ █████████ █████ ██ █████ █████████ ███ █████ █████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ███ ███████ █ ██████ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ ███ ███ ██████████ ████████████████ █████ ███████

Main point · Mphahlele intentionally melds fact and fiction in order to get his social message across
Differences between autobiography and fictional novel don't matter
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Spotlight
Show answer
1.

Based on the passage, with █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██████████ █████ █████████ ██ ████ ██████ ██ ██████

a

All works of ██████████ ██████ ██████████ █ ██████ ██ ███ ███████

This might be very tempting, because we know that Mphahlele articulated a vision for the future. But although Mphahlele believes writers should convey a social message, that doesn’t mean he thinks all writers should convey a vision of the future. The articulation of a vision of the future was Mphahlele’s way of providing social criticism. But there may be other ways to provide social criticism. Maybe, for example, a writer can directly comment on current society and how it’s bad. Mphahlele wouldn’t necessarily be opposed to that style of social criticism.

2%
b

It is not █████████ ███ █ ██████ ██ █████ █████ ██ ███ █████████████ ███████████

This is directly supported by the last paragraph. Mphahlele “shows little interest in establishing guidelines to distinguish autobiography from fiction.” To him, the “whole point of the exercise of writing has nothing to do with classification.”

97%
c

Literary categories are █████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████████ █████ ███ █████ █████████████ ██████████

We know that Mphahlele isn’t concerned with following sharp distinctions between literary categories. But does this mean he has a belief about what’s required in order to pay attention to literary categories? No. Maybe Mphahlele thinks there’s no situation in which we need to pay attention to literary categories. There’s no support for the idea that he thinks there’s a necessary condition for paying attention to literary categories.

0%
d

Most works of ██████████ ████ ████████ ██████ █████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ██ ████████████████

Mphahlele doesn’t comment in the passage on whether over half of works of literature that resemble novels can be classified as autobiographies. He’s not concerned with classification, so it doesn’t make sense for Mphahlele to have an opinion about whether certain classification are accurate.

1%
e

The most useful ██████████ ██ ██████████ ███ █████ ████ ███████████ █████ ████ ██████ ███ ██████ ████ ██████

The last paragraph mentions that Mphahlele believes all writing, including prose, poetry, and drama, should convey a social message. But this doesn’t mean Mphahlele thinks the distinctions between prose, poetry, and drama are important.

0%

Confirm action

Are you sure?