Support The view that every person is concerned exclusively with her or his own self-interest implies that government by consent is impossible. █████ ██████ █████████ ███ ███████ ████ ██████ ███ █████████ ████ ████ █████ █████████████ █████████ ███████ ████ ████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███████ █████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ██████████ ██ ████████
The argument concludes that social theorists who believe that people are only concerned with their self-interest must also believe that democracy is impossible. This is based on two claims: that democracy requires government by consent; and that if people are only concerned with their self-interest, government by consent is impossible.
The argument uses a claimed implication of some theorists’ belief about self-interest to come to a conclusion about what those believe about democracy. This assumes that everyone who has the belief about self-interest must agree with what that implies about democracy. However, it’s still possible that not everyone who has the belief about self-interest will agree that democracy is impossible.
The reasoning in the argument ██ ██████ ██ ████ ███ ████████
infers merely from ███ ████ ██ █████████ ███████ █ ██████ ████ ██ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███████████ ██ ████ ██████
The argument infers that everyone who believes that people are only concerned with their self-interest will also believe the supposed implication that government by consent is impossible. This inference has no support other than the mere fact of holding the first belief.
infers that because █████████ ██ ████ ██ █ █████ ██ ███████ ██ ██ ████ ██ ████ ██████████ ██████ ██ ███ █████
The argument doesn’t make any inferences about the properties of individual people based on the properties of the groups they belong to.
infers that because █████████ ██ ████ ██ ████ ██████████ ██████ █████████ ██ █ ██████ ██ ██ ████ ██ ███ █████ ██ █ █████
The argument doesn’t make any inferences about the properties of groups based on the properties of individual people in those groups.
attempts to discredit █ ██████ ██ ████████████ █████ ███ ███████ ████ ██████
The argument isn’t attempting to discredit any theory. It also never tries to discredit supporters of any theory—in fact, there’s no discussion of people’s character at all.
fails to consider █████ ████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██████████ ██ ██████ ████ ██ ███ ███████████ ████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████████ ███ ███████████ ██ ████
The argument doesn’t attempt to claim that any other argument’s conclusion is false.