Conclusion Any museum that owns the rare stamp that features an airplane printed upside down should not display it. ███████████ █████ ██████ ███ ███ ██ █████ ███ █ ███████████ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ██████████ ██ ████ ██ ████████ ██ ██████ ██ ████ ██████ ██████ █████ ████ ██████ ████ ████ ████ ███ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ███
The author concludes that museums should not display the rare stamp, because this would damage it.
There is a clear gap in the argument between potential damage to the stamp and the decision to display it. We want to phrase this gap as a conditional statement, so we are able to form a strong prediction:
If the stamp would be damaged, it should not be displayed.
The reasoning above most closely ████████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████
The public should █████ ███ ███████ ██ █ ██████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ███████████
Museum display cases ██████ ███████ █████ ████████ ████ ██████ ██████ ██ ███████████ ██████
Red ink should ███ ██ ████ ██ █████ ████ ████ ███ ██ ███████ ██ ███████████ ██████
A museum piece ████ █████ ██ ███████ ██ ███████ ██████ ███ ██ ██████████
The primary purpose ██ █ ██████ ██ ██ ███████ ███ ███████