Archaeologists are discovering a great deal about the Sals culture. βββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββββ βββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ βββ βββ βββββββ βββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββ ββββ βββ βββ βββββ βββββ
The author concludes that the Sals did not smelt iron. This is based on the fact that the Sals did not have any distinct words for iron.
The premise establishes that Sals didnβt have distinct words for iron. Does that guarantee that the Sals did not smelt iron? No. What does lacking a distinct word for a thing have to do with smelting the thing? To make the argument valid, we want to form a link to get from the premise to the conclusion:
If the Sals didnβt have a distinct word for a thing, then the Sals did not smelt the thing.
Another way to phrase the relationship weβre looking for:
If the Sals smelted the thing, then they had a distinct word for the thing.
Analysis by Kevin_Lin
The conclusion drawn above follows βββββββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
If a culture βββ β ββββββββ ββββ βββ β ββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββ
If a culture βββ ββββββββββ ββββ β ββββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββ ββββ β ββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ
If a culture βββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ βββ βββββββ
If a culture βββ βββ βββββ β ββββββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ
If a culture βββββββ β ββββββ ββββ ββ βββ β ββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ