Critic: In her presentation of important works of art in her art history textbook, Waverly claims to have presented only objective accounts: "I have sought neither to advocate nor to denigrate what I included." In writing about art, a pretense of objectivity never succeeds: clearly, Waverly writes much better about art she likes than about art to which she is indifferent.
According to the critic, pretending to be objective when writing about art never succeeds. Waverly claims to be objective when in her art history textbook. However, Waverly writes much better about art she likes than about art she’s indifferent about.
Waverly does not actually write about art in the objective way she intended.
The critic's statements, if true, ████ ████████ ███████ █████ ███ ██ ███ ██████████
Waverly believes that █ █████████ ██ ███ ██████ ███ ██████ ███████ █████ ██ ███ ██ █████ █████ ██ ████
Waverly has only ████████ █████ ██ ███ ████ ███ ███ ██████ ████████ █████ ██ ███ █████████
Waverly wrote her ████████ ████ ███ █████████ ██ ██████████ ███ █████ ██ ███ ████ ███ █████ █████
Waverly has not █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████████ █████ █████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ███ █████████
Waverly does not ██████ ███████ ████ ███████████ ██ █ █████████ █████ ██ ██ ███ ███████ █████████