3 comments

  • Edited Sunday, Jun 28

    So I don't know the exact formula 7sage applies to the data, but I can think of a couple reasons why this might be the case. Some schools may be more willing to take "super-splitters." Some schools might weigh GPA relatively more, while others might weigh LSAT relatively more. Some may weigh stats less altogether. So being farther away from a school's median compared to another's in one or both stats shouldn't necessarily lead to worse odds.

    1
    Monday, Jun 29

    @AriVilker1 makes sense! I also noticed that the predictions are very different from those on the lsd website despite inputting the same details. Do you have any comments about that?

    1
    Edited 6 days ago

    @ktacklesthelsat I don't have any special insight into that. I'd recommend someone from 7sage admissions respond to this. Although, I believe LSD is solely based on the raw data regarding applicants with very close statistics, while 7sage uses statistical modeling to create a smooth model based on the total applicant pool. I don't know that to be true, though.

    1
You've reached the end of the comments.

Confirm action

Are you sure?