PT114.S1.Q18 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8

PASSAGE 2

Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that a person’s insurance premiums should increase as they drive more frequently. As support for this conclusion, the author cites the positive correlation between time spent driving and chance of being involved in an accident.

The claim in the question stem is the conclusion of the argument: that insurance premiums should increase as driving frequency increases.

The claim in the question stem does not provide support for any other part of the argument, so it is not a premise.

The claim in the question stem is the conclusion. It gets support from the final sentence in the stimulus, which is the premise; the two sentences that come before the claim in the question stem provide context.

The claim in the question stem is the conclusion; it is not offered in support of any other part of the argument.

The claim in the question stem does not anticipate a potential objection.

The claim in the question stem is a conclusion, not a clarification that supports another part of the argument.

PrepTest 114 - Section 1 - Question 18

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action