PT148.S3.Q19

PrepTest 148 - Section 3 - Question 19

Hide analysis

Ana: On libertarian principles, Conclusion I oppose the proposed smoking ban. ██ ██ ███ ███ ████████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████ ████ █████ ██████ ████ ████ ████ ███████████

███████ ███ ████ ██ ████ ████ ███ ███ █████ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ██████ ███████ ██████ █████ █████ █████ ███ ████ ████ ██ ████████

Speaker 1 Summary

Ana opposes the proposed smoking ban because she thinks it’s not the government’s business to prevent people from doing stuff that harms only themselves.

Speaker 2 Summary

Pankaj points out that the proposed ban would only apply in situations that expose other people to smoking. Smoking would still be allowed in private. The implicit point is that Ana’s libertarian principle isn’t a good reason for opposing the ban.

Objective

We’re looking for a point of disagreement. They disagree over whether the proposed smoking ban would prevent people from doing things that harm only themselves. Ana thinks it would. Pankaj thinks it wouldn’t.

Show answer
19.

The dialogue provides the most ███████ ███ ███ █████ ████ ███ ███ ██████ ████████ ████ ███████

a

it is the ████████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████ ████ ███████ ██████████

Pankaj doesn’t have an opinion. He doesn’t discuss whether the government should or should not protect people from hurting themselves.

4%
b

government should be ██████████ ██ ███████████ ██████████

Pankaj doesn’t have an opinion. He doesn’t discuss libertarian principles.

3%
c

the proposed smoking ███ ██ ████████ ██ ███████ ████ ████ ██ ███████ ██████████

This is a point of disagreement. Ana believes the ban is intended to prevent harm only to smokers themselves. This is why she opposes the ban. Pankaj disagrees, since it bans smoking in public (where others are present).

81%
d

the proposed ban █████ ████████ ███████ ██ ██████ ██████

Ana has no opinion. She believes the ban prevents people from doing things that harm only themselves. But whether this ban applies in public and private or only in private is not clear from her statements.

4%
e

there are cases ██ █████ ██████████ ██████ ███████ ██ ████████ ███████ ████████

Pankaj doesn’t have an opinion. He doesn’t discuss whether government should ever regulate anything.

9%

Confirm action

Are you sure?