Scientist: In our study, chemical R did not cause cancer in laboratory rats. ███ ██ ██████ ████████ ████ ████ ████ ████████ █ ██ ████ ███ ███████ █████ ████ ████ ██████████ █████ ██ ██ ████████████ ██ ██████ █████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ████ ██ ████████ ███████ ████ ███████████ █████ ██████ ████ ███ █████████ ████████ ███ ████ ███ █████ ██████
The fact that chemical R did not cause cancer in rats does not mean chemical R is safe for humans. Many substances cause cancer in humans but not rats. This likely because some substances cause cancer through long term exposure and rats live short lives.
This is context that sets up the argument. The conclusion refers to this context when it says: we cannot conclude from “this.” The stimulus is arguing that this piece of information is not enough to draw a conclusion.
Which one of the following ████ █████████ █████████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ███ ███████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ████████ █ ███ ███ █████ ██████ ██ ██████████ █████
It is cited ██ ████████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ████ ████████ █ ██ ████ ███ ███████
It is advanced ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ ████ ████ ███████ ████████ ████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ██ ████████████ ██ ███████
It illustrates the █████ ████ ████ ███ ███ █████ █████ ██ ██ ████████ ██ ████ ████████ ███ ███ ████████████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████ ██████ ███ ███████████ ████████
It is used ██ ████████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ ████ ████████ █ ██████ ██████ ██ ██████ ███ █████████ █████████
It is cited ██ █████ ████████████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ ████ ████████ █ ██ ████ ███ ███████