PT101.S2.Q16

PrepTest 101 - Section 2 - Question 16

Hide analysis

The authors of a recent article examined warnings of an impending wave of extinctions of animal species within the next 100 years. █████ ███████ ███ ████ ██ ████████ ██████ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ████ ███ ████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██████ ███████ ██ ███ █████████████ ████ ███ ██████ ████████ ████████ ████ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██ █████ ████████ ██████ ████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ████ ███ █████ ███ ██ █████ █████

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position

The authors of a recent article were incorrect in claiming that there’s no evidence of increased animal extinction; in other words, the conclusion is that there is evidence of increased animal extinction. This position is supported by data on North American fish that shows increased extinction.

Identify Conclusion

The conclusion is the author’s disagreement with the article authors: “They are wrong.”

Show answer
16.

The answer to which one ██ ███ █████████ █████████ █████ ██████████ ████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ███ █████████

a

Were the fish ███████ ███ ██████████ ████ ██████ ███████ ████████████████ ██ ██████ ███████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████ ██ █████ ███████ ██ ███████████

b

How numerous were ███ ███████████ ██ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██ █████ ████████ ██████ ████ ████ ██████ ███████ █████ █████

c

Did any of ███ ███████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████ ████████ ██████ ████ ██████ ███████ ██ ███ █████████ ███████ █████████ ██ ███████ ███████ ██ █████ ████████

d

What proportion of █████ ████████ ████ ███████ ███ ██████████ █████ ███████████ ████ ██████████ ██ ████ ███ ███ █████████

e

Were any of ███ ███████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████ ████████ ██████ ████ ██████ ███████ ██ ███ █████████ ███████ ████████████ ██████████

Confirm action

Are you sure?