Discussions

User Avatar
13002534245
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT146.S3.Q20
User Avatar
13002534245
Thursday, Apr 20 2023

I couldn't figure this q out because I forgot "either or" could be both.

1
PrepTests ·
PT145.S2.Q17
User Avatar
13002534245
Thursday, Apr 20 2023

Who wrote answer A is a devil.

20
PrepTests ·
PT144.S2.Q22
User Avatar
13002534245
Tuesday, Apr 04 2023

Premises: The only purpose of this disclaimer is to provide legal protection. However, if this company suggest its clients to do illegal things then this disclaimer offer no legal protection.

Conclusion: So this disclaimer serves no purpose.

This conclusion is basically saying that suggesting its clients to do illegal things is the only situation for this disclaimer being void. But who says that? This is the gap we need to fill in. AC A makes this conclusion solid.

0
PrepTests ·
PT144.S2.Q21
User Avatar
13002534245
Tuesday, Apr 04 2023

Besides the false dichotomy, C is wrong also because there's no chance for any restaurant could satisfy J,K and M. And they want to go out for dinner TOGETHER. But in the argument, there's still chances for those diseases to kill those species all at once. And in AC B, since we don't know what these two people exactly can do, so there's still chance for them to fix the problem without any outside help.

3
PrepTests ·
PT114.S1.Q24
User Avatar
13002534245
Sunday, Apr 02 2023

I chose B because I mistakenly thought it expressed"usually change"as "can change".

4
PrepTests ·
PT113.S4.Q19
User Avatar
13002534245
Sunday, Apr 02 2023

I couldn't understand this question after several times of reading. I thought these are three independent sentences cause I couldn't see the relationship between them. I couldn't see the different expressions are actually the same thing. 🙁

4
PrepTests ·
PT113.S2.Q25
User Avatar
13002534245
Sunday, Apr 02 2023

I think the first sentence does work as a notice but it's context not a premise.

0
PrepTests ·
PT113.S2.Q25
User Avatar
13002534245
Sunday, Apr 02 2023

I chose B because I was trying to find "the other reasons". However, this argument never said cars without air bags are safer because of lacking of air bags.

8
PrepTests ·
PT136.S4.Q20
User Avatar
13002534245
Saturday, Oct 08 2022

#help

Could anyone explain why this works?

0
PrepTests ·
PT136.S4.Q7
User Avatar
13002534245
Saturday, Oct 08 2022

#help

So can we say the context here is completely useless? Can we ignore this part of the argument?

0
PrepTests ·
PT115.S1.P3.Q13
User Avatar
13002534245
Wednesday, Sep 28 2022

#13 For answer C, I don't think the "proposal" should be considered as a reference to the book itself but the innovative view Haraway expressed in her book. Because in line 21, it actually used the word "proposed". The rest part of paragraph 2 is about the "content of the proposal".

And the first sentence for paragraph 3, it shows in this paragraph it gonna talk about "the style of the proposal".

Because Haraway stated she thought the old view was not viable(in paragraph 2), and she "proposed" a new approach. This could be considered as a "reform".

4
PrepTests ·
PT110.S4.P4.Q25
User Avatar
13002534245
Monday, Sep 26 2022

Hope this wont be too late. But here's how I would think about it.

First, you have to know what answer C is giving: a historical fact, a question, two answers.

Then, down to the passage, I think the historical fact, is the French settlers discovery (paragraph 1) or the location she found in paragraph 2. Ok, now we got the historical fact. A question, i think it refers to the question Vernon was focusing on, mentioned in paragraph 2. And then it said, Vernon gave us 2 intriguing answers, separated by the timeline, before and after the end of the slavery. The rest part of paragraph 2 is about the first answer, and paragraph 3 and 4 are about the second answer. Dingdingding! We verified all the components of answer C.

Now let's talk about answer B you are having problem with.

First, historical discovery. Yes, the same French settlers discovery or the location in paragraph 2. The method, hmm, looking up document or interviewing the elderly African Americans? But the last thing, 2 questions unanswered? She answered. And the author actually using the word "answers".

Hope this could help. If you find me wrong, feel free to reply:)

0
PrepTests ·
PT110.S4.P2.Q12
User Avatar
13002534245
Monday, Sep 26 2022

#12 could be handled easily if you put your attention on the word "proof". It's not introducing anything or helping anything. It just reflects things already there.

1
PrepTests ·
PT107.S2.P2.Q12
User Avatar
13002534245
Monday, Sep 26 2022

Is the critic aiming at obstacle 1? Or at the whole solution? I think the solution doesn't necessary include write things down. Because of this, I made question 12 wrong. #help (Added by Admin)

0
PrepTests ·
PT136.S1.P3.Q15
User Avatar
13002534245
Thursday, Sep 22 2022

I really like Toni Morrison's Sula. It's a great book.

0
User Avatar
•

Wednesday, Aug 24 2022

13002534245

How to translate an "All...and"statement?

So here is the sentence:

All men and women are merely players.

I know it should translate as: men and women➡️ merely players.

And the contrapositive should be: /MP ➡️/men or /women.

But why it shouldn't be translated separately? In this sentence, "men and women" is not some kind of combination, I think they are separate conditions. You don't need to be men and women at the same time to be merely players. Just being men or women can activate the sufficient condition. I mean the "and"here, is actually an exclusive OR.

So I think it should diagram as: men or women ➡️ merely players.

And the contrapositive should be: /MP ➡️/men and /women.

If you find me made any silly mistake, please point it out. I am really confused right now. Thanks in advance!

0
PrepTests ·
PT125.S2.Q25
User Avatar
13002534245
Friday, Aug 12 2022

if i can be a panda who cares LS anyway

1
PrepTests ·
PT125.S4.Q7
User Avatar
13002534245
Sunday, Aug 07 2022

I think it's because the answer doesn't mention their response to the light. Maybe before the test, they are already accustomed to the light but they do nothing to response the light. But after the test, they are tensing their foot to response like they think the light equals to the turbulence.

1
PrepTests ·
PT133.S1.Q14
User Avatar
13002534245
Tuesday, Aug 02 2022

The point is generally in Waller's conclusion. Generally be accepted means being accepted by most of people but not everyone.

0
PrepTests ·
PT133.S1.Q19
User Avatar
13002534245
Tuesday, Aug 02 2022

this one reminds me of pt65 s4 Q23

2
PrepTests ·
PT110.S4.P3.Q15
User Avatar
13002534245
Friday, Jul 29 2022

#help

I don't get it.. How come the last paragraph related to the other paragraphs?

0
PrepTests ·
PT123.S4.P4.Q23
User Avatar
13002534245
Wednesday, Jul 27 2022

When you find a 4 stars passage and you got them all right and you are very happy about this, then you heard JY said this is a very easy passage and you should got them all right.

6
PrepTests ·
PT137.S1.P2.Q10
User Avatar
13002534245
Wednesday, Jul 27 2022

10. I eliminated D and E at first, left A, B and C. A and B are something explicitly stated in the passage. If A, why not B? Same, if B, why not A? And I also noticed the question stem, it used"inferred", that's enough for me to eliminate A and B.

2
PrepTests ·
PT137.S4.Q25
User Avatar
13002534245
Monday, Jul 25 2022

#help

I found something else. But I am not sure this is also a subtle flaw.

Why Formula found in Blizzard = Blizzard? And why Policies committed by Gomez= Gomez? Could other toothpaste use this formula too? Could other candidates apply those policies too?

This is why I eliminated A. Because in the first sentence it says "Gomez's policies would be best". If we take that into the argument, the argument should say"the formula of Blizzard toothpaste is the best way". I don't know if it counts.

2
PrepTests ·
PT137.S4.Q24
User Avatar
13002534245
Monday, Jul 25 2022

The argument is saying this work is not one of Larocque's because L never used orpiment. B is trying to say that this work might be one of Larocque's because it's unsigned and L never signed. Attacking from another point doesn't make the original point any weaker.

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?