It's not exactly expensive ($40), but I'm just wondering if the info is even worth absorbing.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Plenty of schools have successful people outside of the T-14's and there's no reason to believe that the market will change that drastically in the coming years. It might be useful to look at employment and salary data of the schools outside the random category of the top 14 law schools.
I was stubborn at first thinking that J.Y. was just using hyperbole, but as someone who's weakest section was logic games for the longest time (SEVERAL months, much longer than almost really anyone I know), the most improvement I made was when I repeated games at least that many times. When I repeated them to that point, I could even memorize the answer letters, but still made myself go through the process of getting the correct answer.
It might not take you exactly 10 times, but letting yourself get to the point where a logic games become almost mindless is a sure way to know that you can rock those inferences no matter what game it is. Even if it seems mindless, you're still drilling those inferences in whether you can feel it or not.
Happy practicing!
All of that to say its circular reasoning... wow
This is probably THE worst argument I've encountered on the LSAT.
I also thought A was wrong because it says "As far as scientists know." Who cares if these scientists don't know? The premises tells us that there is a danger possible.
I only got this through process of elimination because answer C is so badly written. I could not for the life of me understand what it was trying to say without putting a comma or break after "not."
I have not.