- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
You've probably checked this out already, but it doesn't hurt to review this once more since we are learning tons of information. This link gives you a condensed lecture of the bridging concept https://classic.7sage.com/approach-necessary-assumption-questions/
On the one hand, if you feel that the argument is not convincing... that is, if you notice that the conclusion introduces a new element that is obviously un-connected from the premises, then that's a fairly big hint you are looking for a bridging answer.
On the other hand, you have to read carefully... because if you feel that the argument is convincing after reading the NA-type stimulus, then you have made the assumption you need to find and you are losing against the LSAT.
Actually "but" logically functions the same way as "and". They are both logical conjunctions, which means they are language conjoiners. Example: To say
you are a cat but I am not
is equivalent to saying:
you are a cat and I am not
-Other words that function like "and"/"but": although, however, nevertheless, yet
-These are examples of logical conjunctions and they have the same truth tables in symbolic logic.
I'm curious about the example you have in mind where "but" means "some" because generally those two are not logically equivalent. "Some" is a logical quantifier, which denotes the existence of something. Example:
Some things are cats but some things are not cats
Ah this got me.
My line of thought with answer choice A was:
A: It would require further assumption for this to be able to Resolve/Explain... The industry as a whole experienced depressed sales? Why?
(JY said maybe the the government issued a warning about the health effects of soda... but exactly, that's a probable further assumption we have to take into account). I was thinking that this answer choice exacerbates the puzzling issue instead of shedding light to resolve the puzzle.
It seems to be a very enticing space for law exploration.
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/publications/tyl/topics/space-law/