Subscription pricing
Hello there,
Could someone provide me with a condensed analysis of the 'bridging' concept of Necessary Assumptions. I'm struggling on identifying these Q-types and I'm missing a great deal of NA questions on PTs unfortunately.
Also I'm looking for examples or a PT that may have more than the usual amount of these. Could anyone point me in the right direction?
Muchas Gracias
0
1 comments
You've probably checked this out already, but it doesn't hurt to review this once more since we are learning tons of information. This link gives you a condensed lecture of the bridging concept https://classic.7sage.com/approach-necessary-assumption-questions/
On the one hand, if you feel that the argument is not convincing... that is, if you notice that the conclusion introduces a new element that is obviously un-connected from the premises, then that's a fairly big hint you are looking for a bridging answer.
On the other hand, you have to read carefully... because if you feel that the argument is convincing after reading the NA-type stimulus, then you have made the assumption you need to find and you are losing against the LSAT.