Hey All,
I'm in the PT and drill phase of my LSAT journey and find myself needing guidance on personal specifics. Would any seasoned LSAT warriors themselves (or those who know of such fabled warriors) PM me and help out?
Any and all help is appreciated and I will do what I can in return.
@xlvovska162 said:
I say if your employer can write you a strong letter you should take it. Some schools do ask for 3 (although the standard is two). In any case, as stated above, if you've been out of school for more than a 3-5yrs I would certainly get the LOR from your employer.
@jinnylimsoccer979 said:
Ask for all of the recs and figure it out later as some professors/employers lag on responding. I agree that you just need 2 academic LORs unless you’ve been out of school for more than 2-3 yrs.
@leahbeuk911 said:
Generally, for the majority of applicants (fresh out of college, maybe 2-3 years work experience under their belt since high school), academic references (given that you did exceptional in their classes AND you have a strong relationship with the profs) are given more weight than professional references for obvious reasons.
For mature applicants who've been out of school for 10+ years and have been working, it's pretty common sense to get a letter from their superiors that they've been working for a very long period of time.
I don't know which category you are in but assuming that you are straight from college with a little bit of work experience, it wouldn't hurt to include the last one ONLY IF the 2 academic references are each solid on their own. If not, adding the third one just dilutes the whole package and it feels like you are just trying to cover up the lack of quality with quantity.
Thank you all the for responses.
Looks like I should've mentioned earlier: I graduated this past Spring but have been working at the attorney's office for about 2 years. With that, would you all still suggest 2 LOR's or 3 (with the attorney's)?