I'm interested as well. and 4pm EST is 6am for me too haha I see possibly a fellow Korean here? And yes that time works

@ try melatonin. The higher dosage ones can make you a bit groggy though so in that case I adjust it to half a tablet, but ymmv.

I took both and found the November test to be easier and January one far more difficult. The RC sections I think were around the same difficulty level but LR was definitely harder and LG was slightly more convoluted.

@ Yes in the second LR section I remember a strengthen question about frozen / fresh vegetables and another question about primates and overcrowding. I think everyone who had LR as an experimental got the same questions.

@ ohhhh yeah. Those are exactly the questions I got.

Squirrels covering their bodies with rattlesnake venom

2 people disagreeing about a science fiction novel

Marine wildlife pollution

Lakes/rivers on Mars

Aloe vera

Geese migrating in V-formation

T-rex fossils & turbinates in sinuses

Grad student thesis on Kant

Dieting

Jurors using technology in the courtroom

and these were questions in the second LR section... so I guess that must've been the experimental? I found this section to be easier so bummer..

As with other sections, -0 on LG comes with mastery of principle concepts and good habits.

I've foolproofed before and saw some improvement but whenever I'm doing the timed test I typically bomb 1 game. As soon as I realize I missed something or and having difficulty with a game my brain just shuts off and I panic. >

I'm dealing with the same problem, and it's usually because of oversight - i.e. I didn't double check the rules earlier, or pay closer attention to the rules in the initial setup of the game board. I'm hoping that if I practice enough, I'll make sure to do the above that it becomes second nature so that if I make any mistakes, I'll be able to catch it early enough in the game and not panic.

I'm redoing old games now and I figure if I still am not getting consistently -0 in well under the time limit, then there's still room for improvement. So no, I don't think it's a waste of time for you to redo them.

Hi everyone,

I took the Korean exam, had three LR sections: LR (26) RC LR (26) LR(25) LG

I found the first LR the most challenging, hoping for it to be the experimental one. That section had the 60/90 cotton fine thread question.

Was this present in the LR sections for those of you who got an experimental RC?

Thanks a lot for your comments guys! @ @ Gosh the lsat really is a marathon

Thanks @ for sharing your experience! I missed the first part of this session and was wondering if this would be uploaded on youtube or other platforms?

@ coolll I just Pm'd you :)

Check out these links where you can input your GPA & lsat score to show your chances of admission:

https://classic.7sage.com/predictor/

https://mylsn.info/h0io78/

http://users.lawschoolnumbers.com/gpa-lsat

For splitters like us, the results largely hinge on the LSAT score. The higher the score, the better our chances. I have no idea how a second BA would count for law schools.. Though as you're a non-traditional student, if you're able to explain the extenuating circumstances that contributed to your lower first-time GPA in an addendum, I think that would help.

@ This is what I know. A friend of mine who used to attend said she didn't like how cut throat the school and the people were, and had the distinct impression from one of her classes that it wasn't very friendly to POCs.

Not sure if this is the same as what others have heard about CLS. @-1 @

Oops. Haha thanks so much!

Yep did that again and still nothing.