AMA with Sage @NotMyName hosted by @"J.Y. Ping"

Tuesday, December 11, 2018 at 7 p.m. ESTAMA = “Ask Me Anything"

Join us for a great discussion with Sage @NotMyName about how he worked his way up to scoring a 174 (official score) from his diagnostic LSAT score of 148. @"J.Y. Ping" will ask questions first and then he'll open the floor for questions!

🔸 NotMyName's LSAT timeline: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_XxszO_VyN75p0Cq-L8Jj4jXKrdhz11D/view?usp=sharing

https://imgur.com/L0vTRFu

🔸 NotMyName's LSAT tracker: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KlnKTzKr5fpR4SiKzDUp4xrBYUlJNYmj/view?usp=sharing

🔸 NotMyName's LSAT timing sheet:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Sv1r-Qw4DZ4NucLQCO2KVSYyj1PdWRY8/view?usp=sharing

  • The webinar will be held on Tuesday, December 11, 2018 at 7 p.m. EST
  • No registration is needed for this webinar. The link below will grant you access to the webinar.
  • This webinar will be recorded.
  • 💻 How to join the webinar

    Please join the webinar from your computer, tablet or smartphone:

    https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/126612109

    You can also dial in using your phone.

    United States: +1 (408) 650-3123

    Access Code: 126-612-109

    Joining from a video-conferencing room or system?

    Dial: 67.217.95.2##126612109

    Cisco devices: 126612109@67.217.95.2

    First GoToMeeting? Let's do a quick system check: https://link.gotomeeting.com/system-check

    27

    42 comments

    • Friday, Jun 26 2020

      Hi! @476

      Thanks so much for providing the tracking sheet. Would it be possible to get some clarity on how you used the sheet? I guess I am sort of wondering if the time it took you to read through the passage on RC, and answer each question, both things together, added up to 40 minutes - just the first time you ever went through a passage, and then on the second try it took you 40 minutes just for the questions.

      Also, I am not sure what the circle column is for. I've listened to both the podcast twice and haven't been able to figure that out.

      It looks like a super helpful tracker and I am hoping to use it as intended, just starting to track RC.

      0
    • Thursday, Jan 24 2019

      This is awesome. Thanks!

      0
    • Tuesday, Jan 15 2019

      Just listened to the podcast and it was deeply helpful. It was the only piece of media that helped me gain perspective in regards to how my last lsat went, because of how similar it was to the June lsat for notmyname. Thank you.

      0
    • Friday, Dec 28 2018

      @vickylawschool01622 said:

      Hi! Does anyone happen to have the link they discussed in this podcast regarding your LSAT score and finding out the number of questions you could get wrong in order to obtain a certain score? I seemed to have misplaced the link. Thank you :)

      Top of the page "Score conversion statistics" 😀:

      https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-score-percentile-conversion/

      It's also on Dashboard: https://classic.7sage.com/

      0
    • Friday, Dec 28 2018

      Hi! Does anyone happen to have the link they discussed in this podcast regarding your LSAT score and finding out the number of questions you could get wrong in order to obtain a certain score? I seemed to have misplaced the link. Thank you :)

      0
    • Thursday, Dec 27 2018

      @gaeliverson3670 @chevalierkat315 @studentservice it's out https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/18950/7sage-podcast-episode-11-7sager-notmyname-148-to-174-lsat

      3
    • Monday, Dec 24 2018

      Does anyone know when the podcast will be ready by?

      3
    • Sunday, Dec 16 2018

      @studentservice said:

      When will the podcast be made available?!

      +1

      5
    • Friday, Dec 14 2018

      When will the podcast be made available?!

      5
    • Friday, Dec 14 2018

      Someone I've been messaging with since this AMA thought part of our conversation would be helpful to others. Here is that segment:

      I think I took a week off every 6-8 weeks. It's difficult to pull yourself away but when you're thinking long-term like I was, it's more like an investment in longevity. Diet, exercise, and sleep were also important factors. It definitely sounds like you're flirting with burnout. 2 years is a looong time to be studying. After July, it felt like all the burnout I had avoided during my 2 years came crashing down on me. You might considering taking 2 weeks off and doing something fun or exerting to reset.

      Why are you focused on 30 PTs? LSAT progress is more a function of quality than quantity. I'd say it's better to focus on becoming consistent in habits/abilities like quick lawgic translation, skipping, etc than a certain amount of work completed.

      [He had asked how long it took me to move through scoring phases and that's what the timing describes below]

      148 cold diagnostic to high 150s consistently (3 months)

      High 150s consistently to mid 160s consistently (12 months but this counts CC and foolproofing)

      Mid 160s consistently to high 160s consistently (4 months)

      High 160s consistently to low 170s consistently (3 months)

      In order to understand this I think I need to define hard and soft skills. Hard skills are things like being fluid in lawgic and understanding all the ways to weaken/strengthen a causal argument; basically everything that is presented in the CC. Soft skills are things like timing, skipping, etc. In the year that I worked to get consistently mid 160s, I was working almost entirely on hard skills and the soft skills I employed were very conservative (miss 5 per LR). So when it was time to break into the upper 160s/170s, my focus shifted to more aggressive soft skills and that is why you see less time to break into those scores.

      1
    • Thursday, Dec 13 2018

      @476 said:

      @ashleytien240

      thank you for doing this! I wonder whether you have some advice for people who have almost exhausted their PTs (I have done PT1-80+ 82). Do you do some individual Q type drill from earlier sections or do more timed sections?

      There are several problems that come with burning through PTs. Among them, it will be difficult to track your progress and the real test may be more jarring than for someone used to practicing on fresh material. Have you BRed all this thoroughly? I am assuming not since it's a ton of material. In that case, this is not the end of the world by any means.

      Retakes and non-fresh material were a HUGE part of my prep. I used them for LR cookie-cutter review, lawgic drilling, LG foolproofing, and timing/skipping practice. I spent a great deal of time doing my best to read beyond the subject matter of a given question/game/passage and see the structure. I have a 3-ring binder full of LR questions with notes about their cookie-cutter structure. I thought up brief expressions to represent their structure so I could recognize it again like "this thing could have happened therefor it did happen". I also used non-fresh LR/RC sections to practice new timing strategies before trying them out on fresh material.

      So cherish the remaining fresh takes you have and only use them when you're confident you've made some major progress.

      thank you!

      0
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      Looking forward to the recording. Thanks for sharing your story.

      0
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      @ashleytien240

      thank you for doing this! I wonder whether you have some advice for people who have almost exhausted their PTs (I have done PT1-80+ 82). Do you do some individual Q type drill from earlier sections or do more timed sections?

      There are several problems that come with burning through PTs. Among them, it will be difficult to track your progress and the real test may be more jarring than for someone used to practicing on fresh material. Have you BRed all this thoroughly? I am assuming not since it's a ton of material. In that case, this is not the end of the world by any means.

      Retakes and non-fresh material were a HUGE part of my prep. I used them for LR cookie-cutter review, lawgic drilling, LG foolproofing, and timing/skipping practice. I spent a great deal of time doing my best to read beyond the subject matter of a given question/game/passage and see the structure. I have a 3-ring binder full of LR questions with notes about their cookie-cutter structure. I thought up brief expressions to represent their structure so I could recognize it again like "this thing could have happened therefor it did happen". I also used non-fresh LR/RC sections to practice new timing strategies before trying them out on fresh material.

      So cherish the remaining fresh takes you have and only use them when you're confident you've made some major progress.

      3
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      @studentservice said:

      @studentservice said:

      Thanks @476 for sharing your experience! I missed the first part of this session and was wondering if this would be uploaded on youtube or other platforms?

      It will be uploaded as a podcast episode!

      When do you plan on updating it?

      1
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      thank you for doing this! I wonder whether you have some advice for people who have almost exhausted their PTs (I have done PT1-80+ 82). Do you do some individual Q type drill from earlier sections or do more timed sections?

      0
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      @476 Yes! I have some follow up questions, and I'll PM you. And thanks for sharing the file! It looks awesome!!

      @studentservice YES!

      0
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      @476 shared a timing sheet with us and you can take a look here:

      https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Sv1r-Qw4DZ4NucLQCO2KVSYyj1PdWRY8/view?usp=sharing

      1
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      @studentservice said:

      Thanks @476 for sharing your experience! I missed the first part of this session and was wondering if this would be uploaded on youtube or other platforms?

      It will be uploaded as a podcast episode!

      3
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      Thanks @476 for sharing your experience! I missed the first part of this session and was wondering if this would be uploaded on youtube or other platforms?

      0
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      @junhao31351 thank you. I did schedule vacations every so often though and also the 10-day-PT-cycle was a general guideline that I would deviate from if an area demanded more attention. PTs should be a gauge of progress and are not actually studying themselves (they're tests afterall). For example, in the summer and fall of 2017 when I was having a v difficult time learning to skip confidently, I'd delay a PT in exchange for a few more timed sections to practice skipping. As I progressed though, it would be rare for me to break the 10-day-PT-cycle unless it were to take a break from studying in general. does that make sense?

      6
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      @476

      (1) A year of PT-ing... Wow! I am very motivated by your commitment and encouraged by your perseverance.

      (2). Thanks for sharing the story and the file!

      0
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      Hi @junhao31351

      I didn't share the whole calendar because I was too lazy to go through it and anonymize it : ). I was PTing before 7Sage but I was doing it all wrong so I don't really count that time. I started PTing under the 7Sage approach in May/June of 2017 and took a PT every 10 days from that time onward.

      I'm going to ask Student Services to share it in this thread. Stay tuned.

      1
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      @476 Thanks for the webinar! I really enjoyed it! I would like to ask some questions I didn't get to ask:

      (1) For how long did you work on your PTs? The excel file indicates that you started PT-ing July 2017. Is that right?

      (2) Could you also share your timing sheet?

      0
    • Wednesday, Dec 12 2018

      If anyone has additional questions they weren't able to ask, please feel free to ask them here or DM me and I will respond as soon as I can.

      2
    • Tuesday, Dec 11 2018

      @ashleytien240 right, I definitely don't have 2 years :(

      0

    Confirm action

    Are you sure?