Some great tips here, though I'd concur with others on the splitting.

If you lock all this down and are still struggling with time, then you should video tape yourself taking an LG section (preferable from overhead).

There's no better way to see how you waste little bits of time that add up to a lot over the course of the section.

It's as powerful as watching recordings of yourself doing public speaking in order to improve.

Bumping for any fall test takers still needing help with Logic Games.

I'd definitely throw Sapiens on this list now.

@xadrianas6x881 said:

"If you can take a train I'd say that's 100% doable "

Ha! This is AZ. Pay little taxes, get little benefit. No such thing as trains. Or really much in the way of mass transit at all. Nearly everyone drives. To have an honest-to-god, city-hopping train would be amazing. CA folks may complain of their taxes, but you guys don't know how good you have it there.

My kiddo should be 10 by the time I leave for law school, maybe 11 if things don't work out right on schedule. We're old school parents who encourage independence and responsibility, so she has learned to do a lot for herself and around the house. The emotional toll is something I can't control, though. We talk about it often, so she knows what's going on, why it's important, how it helps her and our family, and that she'll have good support and care even if I'm not here. So far, she's handling the idea very well.

There is also the possibility of my family coming down to spend time with me during weekends as well at the school's location, maybe upwards of twice a month. So maybe something could be arranged to make it easier. In the summers, potentially for a week at a time. Definitely food for thought.

If I understand you correctly, summers are pretty mandatory for necessary internships and other credit related work? I kinda figured that might be the case for 2L, but didn't count on that for 1L.

Anyway, thanks for the responses! You rock!

As far as summers go, you just want to maximize utility for your own life, but no matter what you want to be gaining more legal experience in some form or another, at least part time. Even people who struggle to find jobs before graduation have been getting legal experience during their summers, so there aren't really many people who don't do some legal work during 1L summer. Well paid legal internships are the best possible outcome for most people, but public interest work doesn't usually pay unless you have some type of stipend or fellowship to do the work. So anyone looking into public interest has their hands tied to just endure unpaid work for the most part. As I mentioned previously, it was better for me to take 4 credits for an externship and work part time rather than taking a stipend. Maybe you would want to seek out 8 week gigs to spend more time with your family, or find something close to you for legal work. You've got to hustle one way or the other on the employment front and then still make it fit with your life.

UCI has one of the highest rates of student satisfaction in the country. Trust me you won't regret the decision.

@cstrobel445 said:

UCI recently UCLA in biglaw/clerkship numbers at 41 percent. Do you think this is sustainable or its anomaly? I'm just slightly worried that the exceptionally small class played a role, whixh wont be the case when class of 2021 graduate.

The clerkship side of things is definitely sustainable given the relationships the school, faculty, and administrators have established.

On the big law side, of course it's sustainable if more people who want to do big law keep coming here. UCI's big law numbers have always been largely suppressed by people self-selecting for public interest, which has always been and continues to be the school's focus. The school has proven itself that it can produce plenty of big law attorneys who can perform at a high level, many of whom are being groomed for partnership over the next few years. We've sent transfers to Harvard, so frankly from my perspective the school has now more than shown that it provides opportunities for people who are willing to come and seize them. Will it be easier for you to get big law from the T-14? Almost invariably yes because the GPA requirements will be lower.

But again I really don't see the value in putting too much stock in numbers like this at any school because I think it is still all about individuals. UCI could randomly admit people with all sorts of career desires that all end up in public interest and the big law rate would drop to zero. Would that mean you couldn't get big law from UCI? No, of course not. You either show up ready to hustle and make things happen for yourself, or you hustled enough before to go somewhere you don't need to hustle so much.

@katrakkade441 said:

@974 said:

Hey y'all!

After meeting my second 7Sager in the wild at ASW this past weekend (forgot to get a screen name) I thought it was high time to pop back over here and see how things are going and if anyone has any UCI related questions they want to ask me or maybe even @cstrobel445 if he can spare the time during 1L. I'm currently a second year JD/MBA student at UCI; I finished my 1L last May and am in my first full year of business school and have another quarter in the fall before I head back to the law school next spring. I won't go into too much more detail than that to start but I'm happy to answer anything I can about UCI, JD/MBAs, law school with kids (two boys under four), pro bono, externships, OCI, law school as an older/non-traditional student, student government and organizations, law school as a veteran, or whatever else strikes your fancy. I'll try to check in on a regular basis to see what questions y'all have.

And for all the 7Sagers heading this way I can't wait to meet y'all!

If you want to read more ramblings about law school, business school, politics and more, you can also follow me on Twitter here (my DMs are open if anyone ever wants to reach out directly and I check that much more often): https://twitter.com/cametosayhello

P.S. - it should go without saying but because this is law school I'll just point out that everything here is solely my opinion and I'm not here on behalf of the school in any official capacity, nor do I speak for them.

Hey, UCI is one of the schools I'm most interested in. It seems like a new and exciting program and who doesn't want to be a part of something exciting, right? Could you speak on my perception of it? What kind of vibe does the campus have? How much so-cal influence makes it on campus? Are you from so-cal? What was your gpa, lsat and age coming in? Sorry if you've answered similar questions, I haven't read the entire thread yet and am gearing up to leave work soon.

With barely over 1,000 graduates it is an incredibly small and unique environment, though it is growing every year. My class was the largest in school history until last year's 1L class and this year's incoming class looks poised to beat that. If you need 200 years of storied history and prestige to carry you aloft into a lifetime of top notch careers you are barking up the wrong tree. But it sounds like you're more the innovative, entrepreneurial type who would enjoy building a school's prestige rather than trading off of it. Campus is pretty small relative to UCI overall, it's pretty chill until anxiety becomes palpable when writing assignments are due or exams are coming around, but that's true anywhere I'm sure.

I can get to the beach in about 15 minutes from the library. And by that I mean literally sitting on the beach. Definitely the best locale of any Top 25 law school in my opinion. Law school is a lot less stressful without snow pants I guess you could say. It's pretty SoCal vibe-wise as about half the student body is from here so it's generally laid back. You also have to consider it is a young law school started by a bunch of people who went to top law schools and hated many of their experiences in those institutions and they wanted to set up somewhat of an antithesis to those dynamics and I think they've largely succeeded. Now, it's still a law school and therefore subject to all the market dynamics for top law schools and the like, but I think there are a lot of people here who are very dedicated to ensuring this school is on the cutting edge for decades and centuries to come.

@doneill3389668 said:

Oi! A fellow anteater! Im going to UCI this Fall. I took a year off and this boredom and time off is just taking a huge toll on me because sitting around just SUCKS. Cant wait to get back to school.

Are you satisfied with your choice? I know UCi is a great campus, did my undergrad there, but how is the law school? Good group of people? Good prospects?

I also want to know what to expect my first year, as it's the year that apparently counts "bigly"... besides getting good grades, what do I need to do my first year in order to make sure that im on the right path to getting a job after graduating?

You answered on all of my posts when I was studying for the LSAT...you've got a pitcher waiting for you at the Pub.

Thanks

Congrats! I look forward to meeting you this fall.

I am more than satisfied with my choice and have been since I first sat down in Con Law with Dean Chemerinsky and remain even more satisfied with the selection of Dean Richardson to lead a new era of the school. I really love it here and had a really great time during 1L and definitely miss the daily camaraderie of going through that and wish I could graduate with my class but ultimately I get to have two classes and expand my circle. There's a big emphasis on civility and collegiality at the school and I've been impressed with how much we've been able to make that atmosphere endure as we've become ranked and climbed so quickly. No matter what the identity of your institution, once it is ranked it will start to draw people who come only for the ranking and not for the identity part and so it's important for the student body to continue to pass down a sense of what the community is all about. UCI is not without its flaws, like every other institution I've ever been a part of, but personally I've never had a better relationship with an administration than I have here and it has made a world of difference to me.

If you have never done anything interesting with your life, go and do something interesting so you have something to talk to people about in interviews and while networking. Start networking before you start school if you want. If you live in the area already then try to find some legal work if you want to just start meeting people. Get business cards as soon as you show up to school and go to events and speakers that interest you. Connect with people in person, but remember if you don't stand out in some way beyond grades then all of this will be largely wasted as you just fade into the background. Be appropriately memorable. Get to the point where you can get someone so excited about your future that they give you their business card with you having to ask for it.

Also, and this is very important. Figure out what you don't want to do so you don't waste too much time doing it. Some of the best classes I've taken in life were the ones I hated the most because it allowed me to knock certain pursuits off my list. Get as much experience and exposure in the first place you want to practice as you can.

If you're older and have an interesting life, you've already done the work on becoming interesting, so just keep your head and work hard and maybe you'll get by with slightly worse grades than your K-JD peers, but in the end none of this matters after day one of your first job anyways. I've met plenty of people that lateraled to two firms that would never have been hired straight out of law school.

@terrynicholasj326 said:

Hello @974

I am currently considering the J.D./MBA program at the University of British Columbia in Canada, and I am uncertain on whether the extra cost of the MBA is worth it. I don't have any specific industry experience in a field, but my undergrad was in economics and statistics, which were also my favorite subjects. I also really enjoy business, for what that's worth. I have a meeting with the school coming up but I'm trying to figure out if it's worth the extra $50,000 to get my MBA while doing my J.D.. What kind of career opportunities are available to you that might not be available to just a J.D. student and just and MBA student? Thanks a tonne!

All depends on what you do on each side really. On the business side, some people take all quant courses and position themselves nicely for future consulting work, though any MBA could do that. Most graduates I've known have gone into big law but most have some type of desire to have broader careers in adjacent spaces. You can go hardcore into finance and have a bit more street cred in that arena. Though it's not often used for this because the driving mentality is JD only, I think it is ideal for future solo practitioners because it teaches you so much about how to run a business, especially if you take electives geared towards entrepreneurship and management.

Most MBAs are self-admittedly about networking first and foremost, especially now when so many best practices are widely available on the internet. You don't need to get an MBA to learn the content just like you don't need to pursue any degree to learn content anymore, so it's really about the experience of it that you put together for yourself. I'm only like the 20th or so JD/MBA in the history of the school because the program is so new and the law school's focus on public interest didn't put a big focus on JD/MBAs. So we are really still building the prestige and identity of the type of program that this will be and the success of those of us who have come so far will lend significantly to the perception of the program in the decades ahead, which is a much cooler prospect to me than trading off of an established brand.

@xadrianas6x881 said:

Anyway... I wanted to know if the schedule can be worked to try and get maximum time to make it easier for family.

Also, what are summers like schedule-wise?

1L you have zero say at virtually every law school in terms of schedule. Others please correct me if I'm wrong but I don't know anyone who got to choose their 1L schedule. 2L/3L you have more leeway here at UCI but I couldn't speak for other schools that might place different restrictions on people.

Summers are whatever you make of them. You could work part time or full time, paid or unpaid. Generally 1L summers are unpaid and more 2L summers are paid. Unless you have a stipend or fellowship or something all the public interest jobs are unpaid. Credit is way more valuable to me though so I would always take credit over money because it frees up your upper level education. I did a part time externship and worked part time. If you have the right part time work in literally anything you can make more than the stipends pretty easily.

@jkatz1488955 said:

Hello .. for someone considering doing a JD/MBA what advice you give them or what question would u ask them to consider before they undertake such a program ?

Why do you want to do it?

What skills and knowledge do you hope to get out of it?

What kind of career are you interested in?

The other thing I'll just generally say on the remote parenting stuff is that it really matters what age the kids are. If they are under six then those abnormal routines will have much different ramifications than with older children to whom you can more fully explain what is happening. And then once they're teenagers they're likely going to prefer you're out of the house, but then of course you'll be needing money to send them to school, so you won't necessarily want to still be in law school at that point.

On another point I've really loved having kids while going through law school and it's made it so much more entertaining. My kids are almost four and about two and a half and they love the law school and the business school and the schools have been super supportive and they love having kids at all the different events so it's definitely been awesome to see how family friendly UCI is. All that is to say that if anyone is avoiding it because of kids or trying to shield their family from law school it's really helpful to be a part of a community that embraces families and they do exist in law schools.

@akikookmt881 said:

@xadrianas6x881 said:

@welschmeyer300 beat me to it. I was curious about how 1L and 2L schedules work. I am married and have a child, and if when I go to law school, I will have to be away from them during the week (4+ hour drive away). How reasonable is the idea of coming home on the weekends going to be? What do summers look like for you?

Thanks for this!

Thank you for posting this question. I have a similar situation. I have a 7 and 4 year-old and the closest law school is an hour away - actually all of the them are about an hour away from me. Travelling two hours a day seems like a bad idea to me, specially for the first year. So, I've been thinking of staying on campus Mon - Thus/Fri and coming home on the weekends. I'm hoping since most law schools have clinicals and electives in the second and third years that this arrangement would only be for the first year of school. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciatd.

I have friends that live as far away as Encinitas and the San Fernando Valley and they commute over an hour everyday, the latter through LA traffic. Personally I think that's some nonsense but everyone does their own thing so ultimately you have to know if you're up for that kind of life. If trains are in the mix, it's too easy. Otherwise it's all on your tolerance for traffic. If you came home every night I'd say treat it like a full time job and just do 8-6 or whatever and don't bring it home so you can just relax on the drive with a podcast or some music or whatever and just leave law school at law school. If that sounds terrible then daily commuting is probably not a great idea.

As a 2L/3L you definitely have a lot more latitude and could set yourself up to only be on campus a couple days a week or maybe find legal work closer to your home, but that's the kind of question it is worth diving deep on during a visit or in communications with admissions personnel.

@xadrianas6x881 said:

@welschmeyer300 beat me to it. I was curious about how 1L and 2L schedules work. I am married and have a child, and if when I go to law school, I will have to be away from them during the week (4+ hour drive away). How reasonable is the idea of coming home on the weekends going to be? What do summers look like for you?

Thanks for this!

If you've never been away from your child before I'd highly recommend testing that out a bit. If you can take a train I'd say that's 100% doable if you can cope with being away that much (people do it all the time, but it's not for everyone, so don't listen to people who will come at you with some absolutist BS one way or the other). If you have to drive you are talking about taking ~160 hours away from yourself per semester which I can tell you is what's really going to hurt you. I did over 50 hours of pro bono as a second semester 1L and I know that my grades suffered for it but I'd never trade that for the actual experience I got and the benefit I delivered to my clients. I'd say you're talking like a .3-.5 handicap at least, and probably on the higher side given the added stress of just being on the road for two long drives every weekend.

Last summer I did a part time externship at a legal services organization that helps low income veterans. I also drove for Lyft and started a project to help feed the homeless in Orange County, so I kept pretty busy. My kids are in year round daycare so they have the same schedule regardless of what we're doing. Next summer I'll be at a law firm in Los Angeles.

@xlvovska162 said:

Thank you for sharing your story. I am also a parent of two kids, and I am juggling working full-time, LSAT, and earning my HR Management Certificate. I have really thought about pursuing a JD/MBA route at some point down the road. How are you balancing this all? I am eager to hear from others with families :)

Compartmentalization. Don't let your stress compound, let the different types balance each other out. Keeping a human alive and growing and learning is a much different type of stress than reading a casebook or writing a memo. So use them to balance each other out. The less you can bring law school home with you, both physically (in the form of work, books, etc.) and mentally (in the form of stress, anxiety, etc.) the happier you will be and the more you will enjoy the experience. In the end, being a parent turns the volume down on law school and keeps you focused because you have so much more perspective not to mention something outside of yourself to work for. Find other parents and bond over a shared experience most of your classmates won't understand for another 5-10 years.

@welschmeyer300 said:

General scheduling question --

How many days do you have class and for how many hours?

How much time is spent on externships/clinics?

Are externships/clinics more or less like a student-job as in you work your hours during the day and don't have work to do at home? Or, are they like actual attorney jobs where a lot of times you do have to work overtime and might still have work to take home and work on weekends?

As a 1L we had class Monday-Friday. We take 16.5 credits so it's roughly 16 hours of class per week and then four 90 minute classes of legal research that makes up the .5 credits. The 1L school day was 8:15 - 5:00 second semester though we only went till 4:10/4:20 first semester. My year we had basically three and a half days of class so we'd have say Tuesday morning off, plus Wednesday and Friday afternoons off. The Tuesday mornings off is fairly standard for second semester 1Ls because UCI requires every 1L to go out and do a client interviewing project of some type so that everyone gets face time with a client early on. That's only one of the Tuesdays and then a lot of people do their pro bono in that time slot on the remaining Tuesdays. My upperclassmen friends mostly have three or four day weeks for class and then work outside on pro bono or other projects.

Everyone at UCI is required to do a clinic or equivalent alternative field placement. We have eight different core clinics to choose from as well as various elective clinics. Our core clinics are six credits so I think that's somewhere around 240-250 hours of work or so. For clinics people do the work whenever they can. People that prefer freedom on nights and weekends seem to do it during the day if they have time but people do it whenever they can in the end and you work in various size groups in our clinics so that dynamic can definitely affect the times people are getting the work done.

Externships are totally different because you're usually either working for a judge or public interest law office or organization of some type. In those cases you're generally just doing the 9-5 or whatever hours you work there and don't take it home, though I'm sure some people vary in that experience. I did a part time externship over the summer at the same place I had done pro bono so it was a seamless transition for me and I was working about 15 hours per week there on average.

Ultimately, because clinics are school run they invariably take on more of a school work schedule even though you are running your own case(s) and doing legal work. Of course, theoretically if you just ran into the wrong type of management in a public interest setting it could take on various types of dynamics but if things go south you can always tell the school and get out of there.

I'm in my 2nd year of a 4 year JD/MBA program and I love it. There's a lot of things I would love to improve about both sides, but ultimately it is all what you make of it. Full disclosure I go to school for free with my GI Bill, so the calculus is a bit different as I'll only graduate with less than $100k of COL debt, though if you go to big law straight out of a JD/MBA program I don't think it's that different because you can pay the debt down so quickly.

The flip side of the time value of money argument is that if you think of yourself as the investment rather than the monetary debt then it's better to do the joint degree instead of waiting 10-15 years of practicing law and then having to do an MBA on nights and weekends. I have made connections in business school that I know have the potential to pay dividends throughout my whole life and I can't really put a price on that because to me some of them are worth far more than the price of admission. If you go the corporate law route you are going to need to educate yourself somewhere and most attorneys I talk to in transactional practices had to teach themselves finance, accounting, or some other discipline on top of the new legal areas so it cut into personal time there pretty much no matter what.

I think the MBA is really valuable in that it just teaches you another way to think that is really different from how lawyers think so it just gives you a much broader perspective and I'm all for diversity of education so I love to seize on interdisciplinary opportunities. I think a lot of people don't value it because they might not have gotten much out of their own MBA, because again, like everything else in life it is all what you make of it.

The worry that people will not take you seriously as a lawyer or think you'll leave for the business world is a real but entirely overblown concern. As long as you have a narrative for why it adds value to you as an attorney then most people will be on board. It's when people can't answer questions about why they are doing an MBA that problems arise in interviews. I have been asked the MBA question in every interview I've had and it was never a weak point in the interviews.

Quite frankly if I could change law school I would make it two years of law and one year of business because there is just so much to learn on the MBA side as they have so much more geared towards leadership, organizational behavior, management, and other soft skills that would be really value added for lawyers and law firms.

Finally, I think a JD/MBA will become an increasingly valuable degree for individuals as the legal industry is revolutionized by automation and other legal tech because JD/MBAs will have the ability to be a bit more agile in navigating a truly 21st century legal system and hopefully pivot to areas of growth when the time is right.

Book briefing is basically using colored highlighters and some margin notes to brief the case in the casebook rather than writing out the whole brief. For people that do it well it's much faster and you always have the actual language right there to refer to.

I don't know any teachers that cold call only one student. Some teachers just cold call randomly for different questions and take volunteers for others. Some teachers cold call a single person to go through an entire case and then have someone else do another entire case. Some teachers don't believe in cold calling. Some teachers use panels where only certain people are responsible for answering questions in a given class. It's all up to the academic freedom of the professors so there's really nothing you can do about that.

@cstrobel445 said:

Do you recommend case briefing?

There are people who come down on both sides of this. On the one hand, if you take the time to brief every case you encounter you will undoubtedly improve. On the other hand, is that the best use of your time? Well one mode of thinking says, if it makes you better and you're shooting for a $180K starting salary then it's a pretty small investment to brief every case. Other people will say just book brief, but others don't like book briefing. Ultimately it will come down to your personal preference and tolerance for case briefing as well as what your professors are like. If you have all cold-calling sharks you better be doing something to learn the case enough to talk about it especially if there is participation involved. If you have a 100% exam class then don't worry about what goes on in class participation or cold-calling wise, just focus your eyes on the prize. Nobody will remember if you looked stupid once in Torts, but you can take an A to the bank.

@cstrobel445 said:

Do you think ktcools was worth it for uci? Do you think uci fed clerkships and biglaw numbers will increase?

I didn't do KTCOOLS but I believe @cstrobel445 did and can speak to that.

We are still increasing our class size (mine was 140, last year was 160, this year who knows) so clerkships and big law numbers will definitely rise in absolute terms. It will really depend on who we are attracting and what their interests are because the strong public interest focus definitely suppresses the big law numbers relative to other top schools in my opinion. The biggest difference now is that this no longer an unranked law school where people are taking a chance. It's climbed from 30 to 28 to 21 now and so there will invariably be an increasing number of students who come here just because it's the 21st ranked law school and not so much for the reasons that we are proud of like our emphasis on a civil and collaborative community as well as our public interest focus.

Eventually we will get our first SCOTUS clerk someday and I'm sure that will be a big milestone for the program. And we are so young we don't even have partners at big law firms yet, so I'm sure those numbers will increase once we do start to see that happen over the next 5 years or so.

@figueroa10040 said:

It's awesome when former 7Sagers come back here and tell us about law school. Thanks for doing this.

You're welcome! Happy to help!

@mcglazo260 said:

Several Questions:

What would you recommend for reading for our summer prior to law school?

How do you balance your workload and organize your notes?

What types of jobs are you seeing a lot of 1Ls gunning for in the summer? What did you do for your 1L summer?

In general, how much time do you spend studying/how much time should we expect to study for our classes?

If you want to do light law school prep I'd read Getting to Maybe (I did not but others say it's a good bare minimum)... I'm more of the mindset that you don't need to prep and can succeed without it but I've seen prepping work for people so it's really just knowing what you'll be happiest with...

I did 1L as a single dad with two kids while my wife was still stationed across the country. I had the kids in school all day and just treated it as a full time job. I pretty much only did law school from 8-6 Monday-Friday and didn't do law school work on nights or weekends with very rare exceptions for memo/motion writing in the most intense parts of each semester. Prior to getting to UCI I found this thread on TLS: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=162799 which is called Lazy's Guide but it's really all about being as efficient as possible. I highly recommend reading it to give you a sense of what you could do but it takes a lot of discipline. For me it was easy because my kids forced the discipline and helped compartmentalize my life so that the stress of parenting counterbalanced the stress of law school rather than them compounding and making things worse. I did over 50 hours of pro bono my second semester of 1L and my grades dipped a bit given that I had to give up 50 hours of studying but I wouldn't go back and change that.

I am a horrible note taker as I went most of my life without needing to take them so I am a terrible person to ask about notes. Ultimately I think it's best to figure out what the exam is like as early as possible and then structure your notes/outline/attack plan to fit with what you'll need on exam day.

I had some friends snag 1L summer associate gigs at big law firms but those are virtually all diversity fellowships or IP fellowships so this is a really small group and definitely not something you can rely on going in. If you have literally no experience or anything then you've got a lot more pressure to get higher grades if you're trying to go that route, but again it doesn't work out for most people. Additionally, UCI is very public interest focused so a lot of people get various judicial or public interest externships.

I worked at a non-profit legal services organizations that provides services to low-income veterans and their families. It was actually the same place I had done my pro bono and once other summer jobs didn't materialize I transitioned my pro bono into an externship for the summer. It actually ended up working out perfectly because dual degree students here tend to need to overload but by doing externship and other atypical credits then I won't need to overload when I come back to the law school, which is worth its weight in gold.

For the pro bono and externship work I did I specialize in discharge upgrades for veterans with less than honorable discharges and so far I've submitted about a half dozen discharge upgrade briefs to the various boards tasked with reviewing petitions. I did almost 100 hours there over the course of this year while at the business school to help keep my mind somewhat in the legal realm.

I think I outlined my study time pretty well above, but everyone is different. The problem most people have is they don't know when to stop or simply can't stop so they just run themselves into the ground and it just creates a whole host of problems with trying to do the work effectively. There is literally no need to pull all nighters in law school for the regular curriculum (I can't speak to Moot Court or other stuff like that). I wrote in another post that there are a lot of K-JDs and another thing many of them lack is effective time management skills. Law school requires excellent time management so if you have problems with that, it is a rough environment to try to learn time management skills in the moment. It's a steady stream of work for the most part, it's all about just staying on top of it and being able to step away as needed for some self care.

@ohnoeshalpme804 said:

Thanks so much for the Logic Games Attack Strategy and for this AMA!

So what is legal writing like compared to writing for something like International Relations?

Do you think doing a journal is worthwhile if it isn't law review? What if it is law review?

Any read on whether clinics and externships prepare you better than the case method?

20 pages a night per class does sound sort of light compared to what I was expecting and even what I have had at times in undergrad. Does that sort of balloon out if you read supplements like E and Es and hornbooks as well as the casebooks? Additionally, were there any supplements you found especially helpful?

What would you recommend for prep as a 0L? I know that the main advice is to focus on learning how to take a law school exam, but it seems to me that I need to have exposure to some substantive law to do that. I was thinking of picking one 1L class(was leaning toward Torts) and studying the substantive material from it before taking a bunch of practice exams for it this summer from schools which have freely accessible test data bases like Berkeley with model answers. Would that in combination with using books like Getting to Maybe and LEEWS book be a good way to get a jump on learning to take a law school exam? If so what doctrinal course would you recommend doing it with? If not, why and what should I do instead? 7sage and your attack strategy have given me a certain faith that any test can be prepared for with enough time and I want to make sure I am as prepared as I can be for my law school exams since there won't be an option to retake.

Finally, I am planning on working on learning to touch type better over the summer. Do you think typing speed played a role in your classmates grades 1L year?

You're welcome! Excited to be back to meet another generation of 7Sagers!

Legal writing is a bit more redundant and dry on the objective writing side (e.g. - legal memos, emails); on the persuasive side (e.g. - motions) it's a little bit more open and you can write with a little more flair given the goal of the writing. Social science writing at the graduate level is grounded in research but writing style is open to an individual's tastes and style. For me it was just a bit constraining, which is for a good reason to establish conformity and common language, but I think we still have a ways to go to modernize legal writing a bit more.

I'm personally anti-law review and only wanted to do it to get the street cred to talk more authoritatively about what a lot of nonsense it is. To me it's just signaling you'll subject yourself to a grind, which I've got more than plenty of on my resume so I didn't need it. If it's your jam then all the more power to you. I'd rather find ways for law students to publish their own works rather than just editing notes for law professors and the like. I don't really have any insight into secondary journals but it would probably depend on what their goal and setup was, but most of what I see across schools doesn't appeal to me.

I'll take practical experience over casebook any day of the week and it is one reason I love UCI because they put a huge emphasis on externships and practical experience (we require every graduate to complete a semester long 6 credit clinic). I think there are good baselines for every lawyer to learn, but the casebook method is a 19th century innovation and I think we should devote more efforts to coming up with new ways of doing things. Of course, once automation and other legal tech fundamentally alter the structure and dynamics of legal practice we will have to redesign law schools to teach the lawyers that can function successfully in that world. The 21st century T14 could look a lot different in 10-20 years if the current T14 doesn't stay on the cutting edge.

I used virtually no supplements all of 1L. The 20 pages was casebook reading. But that's still at least 60 pages total a night or so across all classes, plus whatever is going on in legal writing. The more supplements you read, the more pages you have overall, although I did know some people who just read the top treatise in the subject area and performed all right.

See my above response for 0L prep questions. Do it if you want, but it's not mandatory. I prefer to learn from the people testing me, but everyone is different.

And yes you need to learn to type as fast as possible. It's not necessary in every class but some exams are racehorse exams where no one finishes and word count needs to be high to have a shot at having done as thorough an analysis as others.

@jkatz1488955 said:

First off, thanks for your now-famous Pacifico Method. Foolproofing will, in all likelihood, change my life (because of a much high lsat score) and you were a big part of that.

Did you prepare for 1L? Any crumbs of wisdom on this topic?

You're very welcome, happy to help, and congrats on the score!

I bought Getting to Maybe and never had time to read it with moving and everything. I perused a Civ Pro short and happy guide prior to starting but never finished it and it wasn't that helpful in the end. I had a Civ Pro teacher who broke everything down Barney style for the class and so it was really like having someone teach the main takeaways of Getting to Maybe within the confines of a Civ Pro class. I'd have done worse overall if I hadn't had him so I'd say read Getting to Maybe but even then you might not totally understand some of what it says until you're a bit into law school, though you'll feel like you don't have time to read outside materials.

I've seen people prep really well and crush it, and I've seen others not see as big of a return on investment there. Ultimately it's a personal choice, and just know that it is neither necessary nor sufficient to success in law school. In the end if you have a teacher who doesn't hide the ball at all (rare depending on the institution) then prior prep is really not going to add much, but if it's a class where nobody knows what is going on then that's a place I think you can create more value, but you can also get it done without prep.

If it makes you feel better and less anxious, then do it. If you're cool with just learning in law school then forget the prep and enjoy your last bit of freedom for a few months.

@katrakkade441 said:

Hello, thank you for doing this. I read about a month ago that UCI's ranking (USNWR) actually increased by 7 spots. From the inside, what have you heard accounts for this rise? I've always wondered what accounted for such raises/drops.

David

As I mentioned in another thread, I think it's partly based on its rising reputation among other law school professionals that contribute to the rankings, and partly based on a favorable tweak to count school funded fellowships a bit more than they used to in the employment side of the rankings. I haven't done a deep dive comparison on the numbers but I know those are areas that we had room to improve in.