B) didn't fit to me because the stimulus says "skin cancer...has continued to GROW." If B) were true, wouldn't it be more likely that cases of skin cancer would stay the SAME for the past 25 years, not GROW? I understand the reasoning behind B) and it is the strongest answer, but in my view the stimulus should not say cases increased, rather that they stayed constant despite increased sunscreen usage.

@BenWebster I thought the same because /uncomfortable does not imply comfortable, as we learned negation and opposition are different concepts. I guess the LSAT response is invalid then?