One good way of thinking about this is: "The what (subject) will what (predicate)." In other words, the subject, or the what the paragraph is about, DESERVES a reaction or conclusion. In the Elbert's commentary example, the entire "what" is Elbert's commentary, and the whole purpose was to convey to us that it was entertaining. All the other information was helpful, I guess (as a modifier).
2
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
One good way of thinking about this is: "The what (subject) will what (predicate)." In other words, the subject, or the what the paragraph is about, DESERVES a reaction or conclusion. In the Elbert's commentary example, the entire "what" is Elbert's commentary, and the whole purpose was to convey to us that it was entertaining. All the other information was helpful, I guess (as a modifier).