User Avatar
Independent Tutor
AhmiG

Discussions

Hello! I'm Ahmi. I'm a 10-years-of-work-experience to law student tutor who learned to loathe and then love the LSAT. I started at a 139 diagnostic, scored a 150 official and then learned to turn on the jets and 2 months later scored a 167 official. I now consistently score 170+ on every practice test.

I work with students of all score ranges and backgrounds, but I particularly excel with students who have plateaued and are looking to break open the test. I've worked with students who are starting on their LSAT journey to third time test takers in dire need of score improvement in a short window.

If any of the above sounds like you...please don't hesitate to reach out to me and we can see if we are a fit. Feel free to:

  • DM

  • Email: ahmiglsat@gmail.com

  • Or go right ahead an book a 30-min free consult here: https://cal.com/ahmiglsat

    I'm currently looking to bolster my roster of students with (5) openings at a rate of $35/hr. I can be negotiable on rate by bundling hours and typically recommend 1-2 hour blocks anywhere from 1 to 3 times a week.

Please don't hesitate to comment below, reach out to my DM's or email should you have any questions, and I look forward to meeting some of you :)

2
Lessons · You Try - Congested Highways
User Avatar
AhmiG
Sunday, Feb 2, 2025

Anyone else get suuuper irked by this question? The answer D DOES work by order of elimination....but who says your rate of speed (or lack of speed) necessarily has to do with congestion?? To me, the stimulus says nothing about rate of speed. You could be packed like sardines on a highway (congested in my mind) but everyones still going 100mph...

Sometimes the easiest ones make me second-guess the answers...envious of those who crushed this one in 30 seconds...y'all rule!

3
Lessons · More Competing Hypotheses
User Avatar
AhmiG
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2024

Remind me not to eat Ice Cream while re-reading this lesson. Hello darkness my old friend!

4
Lessons · Skill Builder - Negation 3
User Avatar
AhmiG
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2024

I'm unsure if I got the wrong answer for 4 any advice?

English: Small animals can move more rapidly than large animals can.

My (potentially incorrect)Negated English: Small animals can not move more rapidly than large animals.

I used the "some" translation rule.

To me, logically, "Small animals can not move more rapidly than large animals." is no different from the answer provided that "Either large animals move more rapidly than small animals OR they (referencing large and small animals) move equally rapidly."

Curious if I fell into a trap, or somehow lucked into a somewhat logically correct answer lol.

2
Lessons · Group 3 - Negate Sufficient
User Avatar
AhmiG
Friday, Nov 29, 2024

Like JY "If,Then" is the easiest way for me to translate concepts back to English.

I don't want to create a rule or shortcut that throw will me off - but would I be correct in asserting that everrrry time that I see this concept it would be:

/If ---> Then

Meaning the contrapositive (clearly you would have to fix for grammar) would be:

/Then ---> If

Let me know if this is an bad or error prone way of looking at this :)

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?