User Avatar
AksharaViruthagiri
Joined
May 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT157.S2.Q22
User Avatar
AksharaViruthagiri
Friday, Aug 22

My diagram was based on the word few, so I had

children Some <-> Reading

children Some <-> Life Long Interest

I realized the gap was between reading and life long interest, so I connected it to have the following

Reading -> Life Long Interest

This is exactly what A says

I am confused as to why I am getting this incorrect answer when I do this question by diagramming based on the some modifier.

When I do it based on most:

children most -> read not

childre most -> life long interest not

read not -> life long interest not

Life long interest -> Read

Question: How do i know when to diagram based on some versus most not?

User Avatar
AksharaViruthagiri
Wednesday, Oct 22

I am fully interested, and if you would like more insight, please refer to my latest discussion post. I have had a few PT's in the 170s and high 160's, but I have been vascilating in the 160's range.

User Avatar

Edited monday, nov 17

AksharaViruthagiri

LSAT Study Group: Going from 160s to 170s

I have been studying for the LSAT for a while and am seeking to study with a small group of people that I can view as accountability partners. I want to be able to walk through each question to explain why each right answer is right and why the wrong answer is wrong. I feel as if I have hit a plateau, and I want to take the necessary steps to break through to my goal score.

Currently, I am testing in the mid to low 160's and have an end goal of reaching the high 160's or lower 170's. I understand the fundamental principles and have been working to get my accuracy as high as possible, as that is the only way to score in the higher range.

I am open to a virtual or in-person group; I am based in Austin for college and will be in Houston once I graduate.

User Avatar
AksharaViruthagiri
Thursday, Aug 21

Based in Texas, but would love to join you

Confirm action

Are you sure?