I'm struggling to grasp this so I have a feeling I'm overthinking but how do you know if you're inside or outside of the rule? For a question to just say "unless x happens..." doesn't tell me. Did x happen or did it not?

It' not clear why A or D are not the correct choices.

If women with adequate prenatal care have a significantly lower risk of having low birth weight babies, then how does mothers who have babies not born prematurely and receive adequate care and still have low birth weights not weaken that?

Same with A, If women with adequate prenatal care have a significantly lower risk of having low birth weight babies, then how does many babies born with normal weights are born to mothers with inadequate prenatal care not weaken that argument?

Does anyone else feel the justification for why the answer choice is not C for Q5 doesn't make much sense? The answer choice says satisfaction with income is correlated with the neighborhood, and the stimulus says exactly that. The justification in the video for why it isn't that says, well what if this person lived in a poor neighborhood but he was making $100 while everyone else is making $80? He could be happier than someone in a richer neighborhood. Yea, true, and that's my point exactly. He lives in a neighborhood he's making more than his neighbors. If he was still making that $100 and moved up to the richer neighborhood he wouldn't be as happy. So therefore the neighborhood you live in has an effect. The stimulus says the level of satisfaction is correlated with how favorable your income is to your neighbors. That would mean your neighborhoods average income vs yours is going to affect your satisfaction. I'm not necessarily trying to argue to say C is correct, I just feel there is not a very good explanation, or the answer choice was worded poorly. Anyone else?

Maybe I'm reading too much into it but does anyone else feel this is a terrible question, or more so terrible correct answer? After all that we've been taught so far, now we're just supposed to assume what most people recognize? There's nothing about what people recognize in the stimulus, let alone most people.

Anyone else confused on the explanation for D?

He says it's vague, "under what circumstances?", but in the stimulus he literally says "under certain circumstances one shouldn't acquire money. What circumstances? The circumstance of sacrificing your health to acquire money."

The first question in this one is the same as the last one. However in the first one "It" is a referential to "keeping deep wounds free of bacteria." Why is it not the case in the first question on this skill builder as well now?

I know it doesn't make sense grammatically if you made it the object in the kernel of the sentence, but why wouldn't grants be the object?