Hi Ryan, I am interested in learning more. Please let me know if you're free to discuss further. Thanks!

@Shawndeo5 I honestly feel the exact same... I haven't been drawing out the lawgic but I am consistently getting these correct. Not only the MBTs, but the other question types as well. If we're intuitively doing well, should we even bother with the maps? Someone please let us know!

@saulgoodman13 What helps me to think about this is looking at in the visual way. Think about the big circle (superset) as "Force users," and the little circle (subset) as "Jedi." Not all force users are Jedi, you also have Sith users and force users that are not Jedi.

@Jcruzmed Yep! F->S, s^/S, therefore s^/F.

@rainbowmit1 today i learned to never try and "erm actually" J.Y.

@mszchloechen640 I think that is a very reasonable ethics dilemma... but, in the case of the LSAT, I argue that we are not worried with ethics or what a jury would think if there is false/true premises.

@futurelawyerlol Exactly! That's a good way to put it. The super set is cat, the subset is fat cat. Not all cats are fat, but the dogs on the outside are not a part of the superset, cats.

@rickyrivas94 Yeah, I think this is a good example of what JY is talking about. Nice job