I chose A. I admit that it's not perfect, but it seems better than C, which does NOT explain why lions perceive zebras as having effective camouflage. Different does not mean blind. To really be correct, I think C should have said that many predators perceive black and white colors as camouflage or have a hard time seeing them. Saying that animals see colors differently than humans is actually barely a new piece of information, because it's an obvious fact.

"much" now means primary???

I still think A is at least as good an explanation as D, which hardly explains why the primary goal of TV execs would not be to maximize viewers. A is correct, because if people are more likely to rewatch movies than shows, each customer acquired is more valuable for movies than TV.

@remgrandt I had the same thought. That's why I chose D. I don't like E. Even with the "probably", it assumed without evidence that older people do not produce more introspective music. What a shit question.

I don't like choice A. It is obvious and intuitive that the written word harming memory is relevant to calculators hurting math.

This clearly depends on context. In some situations (like elections that are almost always 51% to 49%) 60% would be considered an overwhelming majority.

I chose B and I don't understand why it's wrong.

This is one of the more horrible questions I've seen. I don't understand how they don't both totally agree with each other. They are literally saying the same thing.

I don't understand this one

You can absolutely work full time and study for the LSAT. I am many others have done that.

Hey, I'm open to a study group. (took LSAT once - 162 and my latest PT was 163)

Hi, everyone!! Nice to meet you all. I'm Alu. 32 year old father from Virginia moving from EMS to law. Got a 162 last year but now that that's a horribly low score in today's climate, I am recommitting to the LSAT and hoping to break into the 170s in January.