Is it a bad habit to select A and move on without reading the others? Intuition said it was right and it was, but I know that leaves me vulnerable to trap answers.

Kevin,

I guess I just disagree with your analysis for A, although I overall agree that C is the best answer. Here is why.

When it asks for "expert testimony", it seems quite fair and even the best interpretation to bifurcate the custom-made illustrations from "expert testimony." The two might be complementary, but they are not one "thing", right? Does that make sense?

Upon the distinction of the two, would it then not make sense to say that the verbose nature of the testimonies makes it less effective in either one, establishing the facts of the case or two, assisting one side in making their case? And given that, would it be unfair to classify the author as skeptical of that? I think the broader point is that without the illustrations, he is skeptical that the facts could be clearly outlined with solely an expert testimony.

Additionally, C states "...awareness of the limitations..." while that is definitely a tempered or less extreme than the verbiage in A, am I wrong to say that they're on the same "spectrum" of skepticism?

Appreciate the videos and the lessons. Hope this doesn't come across as abrasive.

Andrew