As I was watching this video, I got stuck on why it is the case that every driver MUST be affected in the same exact way for the premises to support the conclusion and the argument not fall apart. If every driver is affected differently, couldn’t one still draw a conclusion that those who perform best when the supervisor is present (because the affect can be different for different people) will perform best under normal conditions. Are we trying to say that it’s necessary for the supervisor’s general effect to be the same and not necessarily how the driver is affected? I feel like that is different or I’m just dumb lol.

Years of my life have been lost :(

I'm proud to say I got everything correct but this was a battle... good luck everyone 🫶🏽

@adri_1103 Also in LA :)!

Can the Quiz Instructions be updated to say, "Identify and bracket premises and the major conclusion for the following arguments."? For questions 3 & 5, I understood the major vs. minor conclusion but also put the minor conclusion in brackets that I used to identify conclusions. Or is that completely wrong since the minor conclusions are primarily used as major premises?

Hi! Based in LA. Taking the LSAT for the first time in January 2026. Going to Law School after a brief career in Entertainment (talk about a pivot!). So excited to get into studying and connect :)

@JoalGue Also taking the January test! Based in LA but would love to connect. :)