So the examples mentioned about tendency/ likelihood could be understood as correlation if I am not mistaken?

Wouldn't #1 be all premises supporting conclusion ("was only about half the normal width")?

On the 4th is this statement not an all without the structural indicator? so would it not just be not all small animals can move more rapidly than large animals or does the can maybe change it so its not an all?

I think I've figured out where I'm struggling with this: how do we know we're dealing with an embedded conditional? Is it by identifying multiple conditional relationships indicated by structural indicators in the same sentence or even multiple conditional relationships without conditionals?