So the examples mentioned about tendency/ likelihood could be understood as correlation if I am not mistaken?

On the 4th is this statement not an all without the structural indicator? so would it not just be not all small animals can move more rapidly than large animals or does the can maybe change it so its not an all?

@AnishPatel Also why the parenthesis? Is this because we're just talking about embedded? I don't remember seeing parenthesis in the conditional diagramming in the disjunction or video

I think I've figured out where I'm struggling with this: how do we know we're dealing with an embedded conditional? Is it by identifying multiple conditional relationships indicated by structural indicators in the same sentence or even multiple conditional relationships without conditionals?

Wouldn't #1 be all premises supporting conclusion ("was only about half the normal width")?

@baby-lawyer this is exactly where I was struggling with and still kind of am I think, maybe it is an issue of taking the premises as true that I'm having, but I think I see that if we take the premise as true then the alternative window kind of disappears since its irrelevant for Walt? If Walt weren't a member then maybe there is an unknown hypothetical alternate route simply not mentioned? But of course that depends on that being true which we know is not since its explicit that he is a member and the rules of the premise then must apply to him