I got all correct, except #6. My reasoning for believing it was an argument was this...Premise: If an intellectual place is disorganized, it is not well-stocked. Premise: Most well-stocked intellectual places showcase a wide range of books on various subjects. Conclusion: All libraries and bookstores are intellectual places. How could that not be seen as an argument? Couldn't we tie in the first and last sentence? All libraries and bookstores are intellectual places. But, if an intellectual place is disorganized, is it not well-stocked. ...Meaning, libraries and bookstores, if disorganized, are also not well stocked. I don't see how it's not an argument.