@RubiOrellana @GreyHugli thank you guys!

@RubiOrellana Hey! I'm finding two different loophole books: a blue one by ellen cassidy and a black one by jordan diola. Do you know which one you used?

Doesn't the fact that the movie violated a requirement of murder mystery (marife) mean it is not a murder mystery?

In E's description, I feel like it was the contrapositive of correlation implying causation. Why was that not?

For E, the explanation stated the answer allows for "often a higher proportion", instead of strictly meaning busy highways have less trucks. If this was not the case, and the answer were reworded that busy highways always have less trucks, could it be more heavily considered, or would this be assuming a connection that trucks -> more traffic fatalities that wasn't explicit?

@BenWillGold okay perfect, thank you!

I don’t understand. Does C not say “no more likely” indicating it is equally or less likely for businesspeople with chronic insomnia to accept travel assignments?

To clarify, in the "only if" vs "if" statements, the sufficient and necessary clauses are different? For example;

If:

5+ min past bell is sufficient to say they are cited as late

Being cited as late is necessary to say they arrived 5+ min past the bell

Only if:

5+ min past bell is necessary to say they were cited as late

Being cited as late is sufficient to say they arrived 5+ min past the bell

Does the order of the first and second statement matter as long as both premises are there?

For example, question 2 my A statement is "over 40 -> /ski" and my b statement is "ski -> /over 40". The answer given gave the same statements in the opposite order, is there any functional difference between the two?

I don't understand why it is D. The prompt only states someone who is not levelheaded is excessively generous, it doesn't state or imply only people who are not levelheaded are generous, or that level headed people cannot be excessively generous.