@hataie hi! I believe the stimulus clarifies that the business owner donated not out of self interest. “Her action was not motivated by self-interest in any way.” So I took the premise as face value.

I hope I helped in anyway!

Okay Q3 is throwing me for a loop so feedback would be great!

I translated/negated the statement correctly:

P—m—>w & /(p-m->w)

What Im stumped on is the translation back to English as I concluded: the amount of pasta that isnt made from wheat ranges from zero to half.

Im not fully understanding how we concluded that the pasta is made from wheat based off the translations.

Loved this lesson! Everything is coming togetherrr

@Kevin_Lin thank you so much for the clarification!

For Q4, specifically in the second sentence, I am confused about why we are ignoring the “must” as I thought that belong to Group 2 necessary but instead we are intuitively are suppose to know that “in order to” is sufficient.

My overall question is when do we know to pick which indicator rules to follow? Because I chose “must” instead of “in order to”.