Happy New Year! For those that wish to find study partners and be part of a welcoming LSAT online community, please feel free to join us using the link below! We're always looking to share and welcome new folks wishing to connect and study together and ask all the questions (no question is a dumb one, we are all here to learn).
We got a lot of people studying for 2026 (including myself). 💙☺️
all LSAT learners welcome!
all LSAT scores welcomed! (yes folks scoring in the 120s, 130s, 140s, and 150s and beyond are welcomed!)
Anyone can create/lead an LSAT study session whenever. Yes, this is a free and open online space to study.
New to Discord! No worries! Please DM me or ask in the server if you need help navigating this complex app/website!
So far I am grateful for all the support people give to one another on here, and want to share it again in the hopes that more people can benefit from it.
https://discord.gg/Hb9s8XASad Let me know if the link isn't working. 😅
Thank you!
----
I may not always be online, but I'm happy to meet new people when I do host sessions :)
I keep folks updated about the exam dates/deadlines
Updates on 7Sage features and events
At the time of this writing there is no 7Sage explanation but I'll do my best to explain why the answer is D and not something like A which was pretty attractive to be honest. ☺️ Feel free to add or correct me.
So first they are telling us a story about industrial sewing:
give us some set of facts...
if needle is worn, article (clothing/thing being sewn) can be ruined.
Traditional factories: people who specifically have a job to operate sewing machines (note that it's not the people who fix the machines or cuts the fabric) also make sure to replace the needles so they don't get worn out.
Industrial sewing operations/factories are becoming more automated (machines).
would be inefficient to hire people to just check on the needles on these automated sewing machines.
Author's main point/conclusion: sophisticated new device of some kind to detect the wear of the needles are expected to become standard in these automated factories.
What makes this question tricky is the use of certain words to describe things or people...let's see how this impacts the answer choices.
A) In automated apparel factories, items will be ruined by faulty needles less frequently than happens in traditional apparel factories.
so we got a comparison between automated and traditional in terms of the rate of articles/clothing being ruined. Well...all I know from the stem is the fact that needles that don't get replaced frequently will ruin the fabric...but that's it...I get nothing close to comparing these two types of factories (people vs machines) and which one is better or ruins more clothing...we kinda only get what the author considers being efficient for checking the needles. I think for those that chose A, it is outside knowledge/assumption that is applied here that machines do less mistakes and are more precise, but remember its a "supported by the information above" type of question...where we are given ingredients and have to bake a cake with only what we got.
B) In the automated apparel factories of the future, each employee will perform only one type of task.
Too strong...
This one is tricky but we are given a story about those people who work the sewing machines and replace these needles, but what about the other potential workers that are there? The HR employee? its hard to prove that in all these factories there's only the sewing machine folks in there doing one job...but also, what if these folks also do other tasks? like cutting the fabric or printing a cool design on it? They could be told, "well, the machines do the sewing now, time for y'all to move to do another task...
C) Traditional apparel factories do not use any automated equipment.
Also too strong
Notice how the stimulus focused on talking about workers who use the sewing machines. We don't know anything outside this about these traditional factories. They could have other things automated, like the printing or cutting of fabric! Even those conveyor belts (those things that move your stuff forward like in some grocery store checkout) can be considered automated...and it doesn't do anything to the clothing itself!
If it's not talked about...it's not likely to be supported/true.
D) Right answer: The needles of industrial sewing machines wear out at unpredictable rates.
Ok so I know this one feels out of scope but...
This answer hinges a lot on how certain words are used. And a great skill to practice when looking at LSAT questions is to be suspect about what words the author uses.
Notice how the author uses the word "sophisticated new acoustic device". Like why does this machine need to be so fancy? Also why did we need a person to "monitor the needles"? Shouldn't that part be already automated first when the people were the ones sewing?
To watch over anything is to check for something...we are doing an action of checking because it's for a purpose, removing this as an assumption.
There is some reason the author isn't explicitly telling us but it exists/supported. Like to monitor a child, beloved pet, plant, or even a car because they are unpredictable if something goes wrong...same as the needles.
Because the story talks about replacing them at a rate/time, watching the needle, waiting until it goes bad...the answer makes sense for something about the timing. Some needles can wear off later or sooner, but if its sooner, that's a risk the company doesn't want to take...so they need someone to check it, or a sophisticated machine to make sure that if the needle breaks on day 1, they don't leave the needle broken for the rest of the 30 days before they need to replace it again (because that's a lot of production lost!).
E) As sewing machine needles become worn, the noise they make becomes increasingly loud.
Out of scope
Is there anything in the stimulus that would support this? Anything about noise or sound? Unfortunately, no.
This answer is a bit out of scope because nowhere in the story we are told anything about noise or being loud. Though I've been around these type of sewing machines and they do get loud, so maybe picking this is outside knowledge. But also we are making an assumption that there is some indicator that the people and the fancy machine needs to replace it, the problem is that we don't know what that is...
In my opinion, the real indicator was the articles/clothing being ruined...once I see mistakes on clothing, maybe that's my indicator something is wrong with the needle...but I don't know based on the story I got in front of me.
------
Takeaways: 💙
Stay away from making strong assumptions or justifying answer based on outside knowledge.
Be suspect about strong language, or certain words the author uses to describe things
Pretend the answer is some conclusion you are going to make based on the story. Would it be unsound to the judge if I got this case (question) and concluded with answer choice E vs D?