Can a "most" claim be theoretically bi-directional if the size of both groups is the same?
For instance, say that there are an equal number of dogs and pets. We combine the circles in such a way that they both overlap to account for more than half of the circle. In that instance, would we just do d <-m-> p?
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
Can a "most" claim be theoretically bi-directional if the size of both groups is the same?
For instance, say that there are an equal number of dogs and pets. We combine the circles in such a way that they both overlap to account for more than half of the circle. In that instance, would we just do d <-m-> p?