- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
Just commenting to desperately try and get the PrepTest page back. The new format is so restricting for PT info. It was so helpful to see the info about previous PrepTest's on one page, and now we've lost all that valuable info. Thanks
I think the new layout is fine, but the compact layout for drills, sections, and PT's is super frustrating in my opinion. I really liked being able to see all the preptests on a single page. The new feature is frustrating because it just says "taken" next to the PT's you've completed, and it doesn't list the PT's in order. It lists them by which ones are available for tests/sections/drills. The lack of info here seems like a step backwards.
For someone like me who's been studying for a year and has taken multiple pretests multiple times, it's impossible now to keep track of which tests I want to use for sections/pt's. Thanks
It seems like the new feature took away all the information that the previous feature had about previous preptests. It would tell you how many times you took it, what score you got, which ones were for drilling, sections, and for testing.
The new feature has all of that hidden into this drop down tab menu that tells you like half of the information that the previous one had. I spent basically 90% of my time on 7sage looking that page making plans for future tests/sections, and now it just gives you a small little drop down and only shows you one pt at a time -- not to mention it doesn't even show any stats about it.
Any chance i can get this page back and or if I'm missing a preptest page somewhere? Thanks.
How does the passage show that most people in sprawling suburbs don't pay drastically less than they can afford? Obviously, they are choosing to buy the suburban "more expensive" houses over the other ones, causing an economic segregation. But how can we assume that most people aren't paying drastically less than they can afford?
In my head I'm thinking like this - suburban houses cost $1 Million, and the cheaper neighborhood has $300k houses. So there is economic segregation. But, the passage doesn't say anything about how much these people can afford. Maybe most people buying $1 Million houses can afford a $10 Million house... and in that case they are paying drastically less than they can afford.
This question doesn't make any sense to me... especially because I'm failing to see where the passage is supporting the fact that suburban sprawlers are buying houses at the middle/top of their price range.
Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
Thank you!!!