Self-study
I just scored a 161 on PT139.
ConvincingWonderfulTooth
- Joined
- May 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
Goal score: 176
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027
Discussions
ConvincingWonderfulTooth
Friday, Jan 30
Like how do I start looking at the author as more of a moderator just hosting a casual convo of different ideas?
ConvincingWonderfulTooth
Friday, Jan 30
Can someone help me with not adding to the passage? My low Res Summar was "(Authors Persp): ex where CEO is not bound to responsibility to maximize profits" It's like I was predicting where I thought the author's take might be? Will this type of summary hurt me in the future if the author actually ends up having the opposite take or maybe a neutral one?
ConvincingWonderfulTooth
Monday, Jan 19
Hey, I'm also in Broward. Let's follow each other on Instagram, and we can talk about the feasibility details there. Mine is _6randon
ConvincingWonderfulTooth
Tuesday, Jan 13
7sage has different study plans that you can choose from. Some incorporate more theory in the beginning and others more practice. The theory part also has practice questions sprinkled throughout. It sounds like you would benefit most from a LITTLE theory, given your current schedule. Also, if anything, I think practicing a question on your own and then seeing it again later in your study may actually help rather than hurt you.
Did anyone choose B like I did? No one is talking about it, and I haven't seen an explanation as to why "one theory is as plausible as the other" (in context of B) doesn't mean the same thing as " the investigators have not proved that the blaze was caused by campers or lightning" (in the stimulus). We have no proof of either, which is what I thought B was basically saying in the second sentence, just like the stimulus.....
Actually, I think I see my mistake. I read the AC B plausible sentence wrong. It's saying that one or the other theory indeed could have happened (moving from not plausible to plausible), but the stim is trying to negate the two options it presented in both sentences (campers/lightning). Hope this helps someone lol.